kooncewright2932.pdf

(675 KB) Pobierz
Tube, Solid State,
Loudspeaker Technology
Article prepared for www.audioXpress.com
Dayton Audio WT3 Woofer Tester
By G.R. Koonce and R.O. Wright, Jr.
IntroductIon (By GrK)
When I agreed to do an equipment review
on the WT3, I recalled that many times
coauthor Bob Wright had purchased a
WT3, so we agreed to do the review to-
gether. Bob has considerable experience in
measuring V as via the added-mass method
and will concentrate on that topic. This
gives results from two WT3 units and two
users—a more balanced review because I
tend to be a nit-picker.
agreement stating what you can and can-
not do with the software.
2. Readme.Txt—Tells where to get up-
dates and current information. An item I
found confusing is this document lists the
operating system requirement as Windows
98SE, while other places list Windows 98.
If running early Windows 98, you should
check with Parts Express before ordering.
3. WT3 Quick Start.Pdf—A copy of the
two pages on “Quick Start for the WT3
Woofer Tester” that you can view with
Adobe software.
4. WT3_setup.Exe—The program that
contains and installs the WT3 software.
The Dayton Audio WT3 Woofer
Tester is available from Parts Ex-
press, 725 Pleasant Valley Drive,
Springboro, OH 45066-1158.
The catalog price is $99.88 1 . See
daytonaudio.com and parts-
express .com. No serial number
was found on the units .
GRK operated the WT3 from an HP Pa-
vilion zv6000 laptop computer, 1.99GHz
processor, 512MB of RAM, and MS
Windows XP Home Edition version
2002. ROW’s computer is a custom-built
64-bit CAD/graphics computer using MS
Windows XP as an operating system.
HIStory
The “Woofer Tester” name has been ap-
plied to several earlier and current devices.
In 1994 Dickason 2 reviewed one sold by
C&S Audio Labs (Model DSP-126), and
in 1997 Weems 3 reviewed a revised version
(Version 4.4) sold by Parts Express. These
AC powered devices both used DOS-
based software. Currently a variety of de-
vices with this name, having additional
options and higher cost, are available.
SySteM reQuIreMentS
To operate the WT3 you need an IBM
PC or compatible computer with the fol-
lowing characteristics:
1. 64MB memory RAM or more.
2. 500MHz Pentium III processor or
higher.
3. A USB port, USB 2.0/1.1 compliant.
4. MS Windows 98(SE), Me, NT, 2000,
XP, or Vista.
WHat WILL It do?
While you may use the WT3 to measure
impedance of any passive electrical cir-
cuit, we are interested in its application
to speaker work. The WT3 directly mea-
sures the input impedance of a driver or a
speaker system. With the WT3 you may
do the following:
1. Directly measure the f s and Qs of
a driver.
2. Directly measure the driver V as by
any of three techniques.
3. Directly measure inductors of the
size used in crossover work.
4. Develop driver zobels and other
impedance correction networks for
crossover design.
5. Help tune a vented-box design by
locating the impedance minimum
frequency which approximates the
box tuned frequency.
6. With the proper modeling or pre-
vious-test results, you can verify the
WHat you Get (By GrK)
The WT3 arrives in a box about the size
used for handheld DVMs. Inside
are the WT3 tester, a calibration
resistor, the software CD, and an
instruction sheet covering how to
get started. The WT3 itself is a
rather small unit with built-in cables
( Photo 1 ). The computer side has
a 4′ cable with a USB connector,
while the test side is a short pair of
red and black wires with alligator
clips. The WT3 is self-powered via
the USB cable with a blue LED
indicating power on.
There were four files on the CD:
1. License.Txt—The licensing
PHOTO 1: WT3 unit setting on a laptop computer.
audioXpress 2008 1
788370298.080.png 788370298.091.png 788370298.102.png 788370298.113.png 788370298.001.png 788370298.012.png 788370298.021.png 788370298.032.png 788370298.035.png 788370298.036.png 788370298.037.png 788370298.038.png
 
FIGURE 1: Test Lead Calibration with and without leads twisted.
FIGURE 2: WT3 main screen.
proper wiring of crossover networks.
7. With additional software you can calcu-
late how severely a speaker system stresses
an amplifier.
8. With simple software you can predict
the bass response curve for a closed-box
speaker system.
9. With additional software you can design
all the standard bass enclosure formats.
playing! The program will print the help
information, so I did this for off-line study.
Figure 2 shows the very busy main
screen for the WT3 software. It is in color,
which helps a lot. You need some study of
the help information to really understand
program operation. Once you have learned
how, the operation is simple and straight-
forward.
The program has multiple file options
as follows:
1. It will save and recall project files that
save what you have committed to the 20
available memories. This allows retrieval of
information from saved testing should
some question arise.
2. It will save and recall impedance curves
to/from export files. It offers the option of
files with the extension of .TXT or .ZMA.
These are both text files and look identi-
cal. Unfortunately, the .ZMA files do not
match the original format developed by
Liberty Instruments for the IMP tester.
While certain software may properly read
the WT3 .ZMA files, the post-processing
programs I had written would not. They
objected to the long text header before
the actual data. If you have this problem,
you can use a text editor to put the WT3
.ZMA files into a format your software
can read. The quickest solution was for me
to write a filter program that takes in the
WT3 .ZMA file and writes it out in the
classic format of a Liberty Instruments’
.ZMA file.
3. It will save and recall driver files (exten-
sion .DVR) that are common with the
format used by the WinSpeakerz program.
ability to output the graphs to files as pic-
tures. This would be useful when using the
WT3 to prepare material for publication,
such as this review.
The program also offers several options
relative to the printed output. You should
check the options under both the File ->
Print Setup... and the Edit -> Preferences
menus.
GettInG Started (By GrK)
The “Quick Start...” instructions tell you
how to install the WT3 program and get
the unit running. For me installation went
without a problem. Once installation is
accomplished, you do two calibration pro-
cedures, as noted in the instructions. This
calibrates the WT3 with a precision 1kΩ
resistor and establishes the resistance of
the test leads.
When running the test lead calibration,
I noted that the plotted lead “resistance”
showed a rising magnitude above 2kHz.
The rising phase shift indicates this is due
to inductance, which is related to loop
area, so I repeated the calibration with the
two leads mildly twisted together. Figure 1
shows that this helps slightly, and for the
following testing I kept the leads twisted.
repeataBILIty (By GrK)
One of my first applications for the WT3
was to measure the impedance of a baffle
mounted woofer several times. The results
for ten tries are shown in Table 1 .
I think this repeatability is very good.
I no longer beat the box design out to
several decimal places because the pa-
rameters will vary with temperature and
humidity, and so on, and the box response
changes slowly with minor parameter
changes. The WT3 is so quick you should
run the free-air test on a driver a few
times to verify that the parameters you
are going to use for the V as extraction are
a typical set.
taBLe 1: MeaSureMent of repeataBILIty
of tHe Wt3
optIonS (By GrK)
When I first started the WT3, I did not
like the dark background on the plots (a
nit-pick). It made the curves hard to see.
After viewing the information in the help
section, I found I could change the plot
background color. The program has many
options of what you can display and print,
and it is recommended you study the help
files once you have finished your initial
Tr y
R e
f s
Q ms
Q es
Q ts
L e
1
5.95
49.8
1.66
0.62
0.45
0.59
2
5.96
49.8
1.66
0.62
0.45
0.59
3
5.98
49.8
1.66
0.63
0.46
0.59
4
5.93
49.8
1.66
0.62
0.45
0.59
5
5.95
49.8
1.66
0.62
0.45
0.59
6
5.98
49.8
1.66
0.62
0.45
0.59
7
5.96
49.1
1.63
0.62
0.45
0.59
8
5.97
49.1
1.64
0.62
0.45
0.59
9
5.96
49.8
1.65
0.62
0.45
0.59
10
5.95
49.8
1.65
0.62
0.45
0.59
The one missing file option seems to be the
2 audioXpress 2008
www.audioXpress.com
788370298.039.png 788370298.040.png 788370298.041.png 788370298.042.png 788370298.043.png 788370298.044.png 788370298.045.png 788370298.046.png 788370298.047.png 788370298.048.png 788370298.049.png 788370298.050.png 788370298.051.png 788370298.052.png 788370298.053.png 788370298.054.png 788370298.055.png 788370298.056.png 788370298.057.png 788370298.058.png 788370298.059.png 788370298.060.png 788370298.061.png 788370298.062.png 788370298.063.png 788370298.064.png 788370298.065.png 788370298.066.png 788370298.067.png 788370298.068.png 788370298.069.png 788370298.070.png 788370298.071.png 788370298.072.png 788370298.073.png 788370298.074.png 788370298.075.png 788370298.076.png 788370298.077.png 788370298.078.png 788370298.079.png 788370298.081.png 788370298.082.png 788370298.083.png 788370298.084.png 788370298.085.png 788370298.086.png 788370298.087.png 788370298.088.png 788370298.089.png 788370298.090.png 788370298.092.png 788370298.093.png 788370298.094.png 788370298.095.png 788370298.096.png 788370298.097.png 788370298.098.png 788370298.099.png 788370298.100.png 788370298.101.png 788370298.103.png 788370298.104.png 788370298.105.png 788370298.106.png 788370298.107.png 788370298.108.png 788370298.109.png 788370298.110.png 788370298.111.png 788370298.112.png 788370298.114.png 788370298.115.png
 
FIGURE 3: Input impedance to the woofer measured by WT3
and Audiosuite.
FIGURE 4: Input impedance to the Mid/Bass measured by WT3
and Audiosuite.
coMparISon WItH LIBerty
InStruMentS’ audIoSuIte
(By GrK)
In an attempt to determine the accuracy of
the WT3, I free-air tested the three drivers
in Table 2 with both the WT3 and Au-
diosuite. Figure 3 shows the comparison
results for the woofer mounted on a small
baffle. The two curves match extremely
well; only near the resonance and around
20kHz can you identify that there are two
curves on the plot. The same comparison
is shown for the mid/bass driver in Fig. 4
with, again, a near perfect match. Figure
5 is the comparison for the tweeter also
showing very good agreement. The slight
differences seen at high frequency may be
due in part to the WT3’s lead inductance
as discussed earlier.
I had both units compute the driver
T/S parameters. Only the woofer had V as
extracted via the closed-box method. Table
3 compares the test results obtained with
the catalog 4 data.
The two measurement systems show
reasonable agreement with each other but
not always with the catalog data. With
two different test instruments some vari-
ation is to be expected. For the woofer,
either measured set of parameters should
result in a reasonable enclosure design. It
might not be the same size as one based
on the catalog data.
For the mid/bass and tweeter the mea-
sured data is in better agreement with
the catalog data. These drivers were all
new and had no break-in. My experience
is modern drivers don’t change as much
with break-in as we saw in the past.
The WT3 allows you to extract the
driver V as the “easy way,” by specifying the
driver SPL in dB/W/M. This technique
must be used very carefully. First, some
manufacturers will specify the SPL in
dB/2.83V/M. If your driver is truly 8Ω,
then the two specifications are the same,
because 2.83V RMS will put 1W into an
8Ω load. If the driver is other than 8Ω,
you must correct the dB/2.83V/M rating
according to the following:
dB/W/M = dB/2.83V/M + 10 *
Log 10 (R n /8)—where R n is the nominal
driver impedance
For example, a 4Ω driver with a
91dB/2.83V/M SPL would add 10 *
Log 10 (0.5) or -3dB yielding SPL = 88dB/
W/M. This makes sense because 2.83V
RMS would deliver 2W to 4Ω, which is
3dB higher than 1W.
I had the WT3 extract the V as in cubic
feet for the woofer and mid/bass drivers
based on the catalog SPL ( Table 4 ). The
value for the woofer does not agree well
with the closed-box measured value of
0.43-0.45 or the catalog value of 1.23. The
mid/bass result of 0.079 is much closer to
the catalog value of 0.09ft 3 . If the free-air
f s and Qs reported by WT3 agree well
with the catalog values, then this tech-
nique is probably safe. If those values do
not agree with catalog data, then I would
not use the SPL approach to predict V as .
If the catalog f s and Qs agree with your
driver, then you might just as well use the
catalog V as value.
taBLe 2: tHree teSt drIverS uSed By
GrK (aLL neW WItH no BreaK-In)
Woofer
Vifa* P17WJ00-08 6½
Mid/Bass
Vifa* MG10SD09-08 4
Tweeter
Vifa* XT25TG30-04 1
dual concentric ring
*Note: Tymphany Peerless now calls these V-Line drivers
taBLe 3: coMparISon of Wt3 and audIoSuIte reSuLtS
Woofer
4 Mid/Bass
Tweeter
WT3
AuSw
Cat.
WT3
AuSw
Cat.
WT3
AuSw
Cat.
Units
R e
6.01
5.97
5.8
5.42
5.23
5.5
2.93
3.08
3.0
Ohms
f s
49.8
48.6
37
91. 5
92.0
81
513
513
500
Hz
Q ms
1.56
1.40
1.55
5.34
5.22
3.40
2.84
2.74
2.5
Q es
0.61
0.57
0.45
0.88
0.82
0.73
0.62
0.63
0.71
taBLe 4: v aS extractIon BaSed on SpL
Driver
Q ts
0.45
0.41
0.35
0.76
0.71
0.60
0.51
0.51
0.55
V as
0.45
0.43
1.23
0.09
Cu. Ft.
SPL
V as - Cu. Ft.
Woofer
88
0.74
L e
0.59
0.55
0.22
0.33
mH
Mid/Bass
85
0.079
SPL
85.8
85.7
88
85
88.5
dB/W/M
audioXpress 2008 3
788370298.116.png 788370298.117.png 788370298.118.png 788370298.119.png 788370298.120.png 788370298.121.png 788370298.122.png 788370298.002.png 788370298.003.png 788370298.004.png 788370298.005.png 788370298.006.png 788370298.007.png 788370298.008.png 788370298.009.png 788370298.010.png 788370298.011.png 788370298.013.png 788370298.014.png
 
obtain good results. It,
too, is a “power” func-
tion in the WT3 pro-
gram equation and
must be done quite ac-
curately.
When I was search-
ing for a suitable
added mass for the
driver, I found that
“poster caulk” obtain-
able at any office sup-
ply store turned out to
be an ideal choice. It
is low-cost, easily ob-
tainable, does not stick
to the driver cone, and
stores well in a sealed
container. The required added mass is al-
most always 200 grams or less (1 gram =
0.035274 ounces).
To accurately weigh the added mass, I
found in my research that there are scales
on the open market referred to as “pocket
scales” that have a weighing capacity of 0
to approximately 200 or 400 grams and
are accurate to within 0.1 grams (0.1 gram
= 0.00022046 pounds). This accuracy is
excellent for driver measurement work.
The cost of these scales is approximately
$25.
When executing this method shape the
poster caulk into a “donut” and apply it
to the driver cone. This allows the added
mass weight to be evenly spread over the
FIGURE 6: Effective piston diameter
calculation for a circular driver.
FIGURE 5: Input impedance to the tweeter measured by WT3
and Audiosuite.
MeaSureMent of drIver
v aS vIa tHe added-MaSS
tecHnIQue (By roW)
In the WT3 program under “Driver Pa-
rameters,” the second of three methods
provided for in the program for determin-
ing the driver characteristics is named the
“Added Mass Method.” This method uses
two physical parameters to generate the
basic outputs of the program. These are
(1) the effective piston diameter designat-
ed “D” in the program input and (2) the
added mass designated “M” in the pro-
gram input. The speakers used in this test
were not “broken in.” It has been my expe-
rience that the T/S values do not change
significantly under these conditions.
It is very important to get a very accu-
rate effective or active cone diameter and/
or equivalent cone diameter. It is generally
accepted that the mean piston diameter
includes one-half of the speaker surround.
This measurement must be done as ac-
curately as possible, because the area of
the driver cone is a “power” function in the
WT3 program. Any inaccurate input to
the program will make a more than pro-
portionate difference in the results gener-
ated. Figures 6-8 give real and equiva-
lent mean diameters of the most common
driver cone shapes found on the market
today.
The mass to be added to the speaker
cone must be weighed very accurately to
FIGURE 8:
Effective pis-
ton diameter
calculation for
rounded paral-
lelogram driver.
FIGURE 7: Effective piston diameter calculation for ellipsoidal
driver.
4 audioXpress 2008
www.audioXpress.com
788370298.015.png 788370298.016.png 788370298.017.png 788370298.018.png
 
surface of the cone, emulating a balanced
cone. The amount of weight to be added
is determined by the WT3 program it-
self. However, there are some suggestions
in the help file of the WT3 program.
The program will analyze the amount of
weight added to the cone and determine
whether it is adequate to properly calculate
the driver parameters and, when necessary,
instruct the user as to what remedial ac-
tion should be taken. When all of the
input parameters have been satisfied, the
program will produce a driver parameter
datasheet.
The drivers selected for testing were
two 8″ woofers and two 6½″ woofers.
Based on a recommendation by George
Augspurger, we tested each woofer with
three different values of test weight, then
averaged the V as values. The results of
these tests are listed in Table 5 .
In the 6½″ unit 1 of the woofer testing,
the V as variations from three different test
weight values were 0.958 (44.4g), 0.901
(59.5g), and 0.808 (74.7g), with the aver-
age = 0.889 the others are not listed.
ment of such shunt networks.
A corollary application of the WT3
is in verifying that you have connected
the components in a crossover correctly.
If you know, from previously testing or
modeling, what the impedance into the
crossover should be, then the WT3 can
quickly verify you are still showing that
impedance.
Last summer I was simultaneously
working with three pairs of breadboard
three-way crossovers. This involved mak-
ing changes in them and trying them on
speaker systems. The WT3 would have
been ideal in verifying I had the pairs
wired the same and that I had not mis-
taBLe 5: reSuLtS for dayton dc160S-8 6½" Woofer and dayton dc200-8" Woofer
Catalog 8 Catalog
Unit 1
Unit 2
Data
Unit 1
Unit 2
Data
Units
f s
31.6
31.6
33
31.6
30.3
29
Hz
Q ms
2.04
2.28
3.89
2.23
1.93
3.23
Q es
0.34
0.33
0.34
0.53
0.47
0.44
Q ts
0.29
0.29
0.32
0.43
0.38
0.38
V as
0.89
0.92
0.78
1.28
1.31
2.04
Cu. Ft.
L e
1.54
1.49
2.40
2.08
1.86
1.60
mH
SPL
86.0
86.0
87
84.9
84.9
88
dB/W/M
ZoBeL and otHer
coMpenSatIon netWorK
deveLopMent (By GrK)
The WT3 is ideal for developing zobels
and other impedance compensating net-
works. Figure 9 shows the free-air im-
pedance into the test woofer with and
without a simple R-C zobel as printed by
the WT3. It is easy to play with the zobel
values and have the WT3 retest because of
its speed.
Last summer I was developing a system
using a first-order crossover with a tweeter
having a very high impedance peak at
resonance. This was causing trouble with
the low slope of the first-order high-pass
network. Figure 10 shows the bare tweet-
er impedance and the impedance with a
zobel and series L-R-C network across the
tweeter to tame the resonance peak. Note
that not only do these networks improve
the magnitude, but they also improve the
phase angle.
My experience is that correcting such
effects by networks shunted across the
driver results in a better-sounding system
than doing it with networks placed in se-
ries with the driver. My rule for crossover
design is to keep the number of compo-
nents in series with the driver to a mini-
mum. The WT3 is ideal for the develop-
FIGURE 9: Input impedance to woofer with and without zobel.
FIGURE 10: Input impedance to tweeter with and without compensation networks.
audioXpress 2008 5
788370298.019.png 788370298.020.png 788370298.022.png 788370298.023.png 788370298.024.png 788370298.025.png 788370298.026.png 788370298.027.png 788370298.028.png 788370298.029.png 788370298.030.png 788370298.031.png 788370298.033.png 788370298.034.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin