Ball - An Elementary Introduction to Modern Convex Geometry.pdf

(581 KB) Pobierz
ball.dvi
Flavors of Geometry
MSRI Publications
Volume 31 , 1997
An Elementary Introduction
to Modern Convex Geometry
KEITH BALL
Contents
Preface
1
Lecture 1. Basic Notions
2
Lecture 2. Spherical Sections of the Cube
8
Lecture 3. Fritz John's Theorem
13
Lecture 4. Volume Ratios and Spherical Sections of the Octahedron
19
Lecture 5. The Brunn{Minkowski Inequality and Its Extensions
25
Lecture 6. Convolutions and Volume Ratios: The Reverse Isoperimetric
Problem 32
Lecture 7. The Central Limit Theorem and Large Deviation Inequalities 37
Lecture 8. Concentration of Measure in Geometry
41
Lecture 9. Dvoretzky's Theorem
47
Acknowledgements
53
References
53
Index
55
Preface
These notes are based, somewhat loosely, on three series of lectures given by
myself, J. Lindenstrauss and G. Schechtman, during the Introductory Workshop
in Convex Geometry held at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in
Berkeley, early in 1996. A fourth series was given by B. Bollobas, on rapid
mixing and random volume algorithms; they are found elsewhere in this book.
The material discussed in these notes is not, for the most part, very new, but
the presentation has been strongly influenced by recent developments: among
other things, it has been possible to simplify many of the arguments in the light
of later discoveries. Instead of giving a comprehensive description of the state of
the art, I have tried to describe two or three of the more important ideas that
have shaped the modern view of convex geometry, and to make them as accessible
1
389499212.026.png 389499212.027.png 389499212.028.png 389499212.029.png
2
KEITH BALL
as possible to a broad audience. In most places, I have adopted an informal style
that I hope retains some of the spontaneity of the original lectures. Needless to
say, my fellow lecturers cannot be held responsible for any shortcomings of this
presentation.
I should mention that there are large areas of research that fall under the
very general name of convex geometry, but that will barely be touched upon in
these notes. The most obvious such area is the classical or \Brunn{Minkowski"
theory, which is well covered in [Schneider 1993]. Another noticeable omission is
the combinatorial theory of polytopes: a standard reference here is [Brndsted
1983].
Lecture 1. Basic Notions
The topic of these notes is convex geometry. The objects of study are con-
vex bodies: compact, convex subsets of Euclidean spaces, that have nonempty
interior. Convex sets occur naturally in many areas of mathematics: linear pro-
gramming, probability theory, functional analysis, partial dierential equations,
information theory, and the geometry of numbers, to name a few.
Although convexity is a simple property to formulate, convex bodies possess
a surprisingly rich structure. There are several themes running through these
notes: perhaps the most obvious one can be summed up in the sentence: \All
convex bodies behave a bit like Euclidean balls." Before we look at some ways in
which this is true it is a good idea to point out ways in which it denitely is not.
This lecture will be devoted to the introduction of a few basic examples that we
need to keep at the backs of our minds, and one or two well known principles.
The only notational conventions that are worth specifying at this point are
the following. We will use
jj
!
for which ( x ) < ( y )
whenever x
L .
The simplest example of a convex body in R n is the cube, [
2
K and y
2
1 ; 1] n . This does
not look much like the Euclidean ball. The largest ball inside the cube has radius
1, while the smallest ball containing it has radius p n , since the corners of the
cube are this far from the origin. So, as the dimension grows, the cube resembles
a ball less and less.
The second example to which we shall refer is the n -dimensional regular solid
simplex: the convex hull of n + 1 equally spaced points. For this body, the ratio
of the radii of inscribed and circumscribed balls is n : even worse than for the
cube. The two-dimensional case is shown in Figure 1. In Lecture 3 we shall see
to denote the standard Euclidean norm on R n .For
abody K ,vol( K ) will mean the volume measure of the appropriate dimension.
The most fundamental principle in convexity is the Hahn{Banach separation
theorem , which guarantees that each convex body is an intersection of half-spaces,
and that at each point of the boundary of a convex body, there is at least one
supporting hyperplane. More generally, if K and L are disjoint, compact, convex
subsets of R n , then there is a linear functional : R n
389499212.001.png 389499212.002.png 389499212.003.png 389499212.004.png 389499212.005.png
AN ELEMENTARY INTRODUCTION TO MODERN CONVEX GEOMETRY 3
Figure 1.
Inscribed and circumscribed spheres for an n -simplex.
that these ratios are extremal in a certain well-dened sense.
Solid simplices are particular examples of cones. By a cone in R n we just mean
the convex hull of a single point and some convex body of dimension n
1 (Figure
2). In R n , the volume of a cone of height h over a base of ( n
1)-dimensional
volume B is Bh=n .
The third example, which we shall investigate more closely in Lecture 4, is the
n -dimensional \octahedron", or cross-polytope: the convex hull of the 2 n points
(
1 ; 0 ; 0 ;:::; 0), (0 ;
1 ; 0 ;:::; 0), ..., (0 ; 0 ;:::; 0 ;
1). Since this is the unit ball
has radius 1, the inscribed sphere has radius 1 = p n ; so, as for the cube, the ratio
is p n : see Figure 3, left.
B n
1
1
. The circumscribing sphere of B n
1
is made up of 2 n pieces similar to the piece whose points have nonnegative
coordinates, illustrated in Figure 3, right. This piece is a cone of height 1 over
a base, which is the analogous piece in R n− 1 . By induction, its volume is
1
n
1
1
1
2
1= 1
n ! ;
n
and hence the volume of B n
1
is 2 n =n !.
Figure 2.
Acone.
of the ` 1 norm on R n , we shall denote it B n
389499212.006.png 389499212.007.png 389499212.008.png 389499212.009.png 389499212.010.png 389499212.011.png
4
KEITH BALL
(0 ; 0 ; 1)
( n ;:::; n
)
(1 ; 0 ;:::; 0)
(0 ; 1 ; 0)
(1 ; 0 ; 0)
Figure 3.
The cross-polytope (left) and one orthant thereof (right).
The nal example is the Euclidean ball itself,
= x 2
X
n
1 :
B n
2
n :
x i
1
very easily in terms of v n : the argument goes back to the
ancients. We think of the ball as being built of thin cones of height 1: see Figure
4, left. Since the volume of each of these cones is 1 =n times its base area, the
surface of the ball has area nv n . The sphere of radius 1, which is the surface of
the ball, we shall denote S n− 1 .
To calculate v n , we use integration in spherical polar coordinates. To specify
apoint x we use two coordinates: r , its distance from 0, and , a point on the
sphere, which species the direction of x . The point plays the role of n
1real
coordinates. Clearly, in this representation, x = r : see Figure 4, right. We can
x
0
Figure 4.
Computing the volume of the Euclidean ball.
We shall need to know the volume of the ball: call it v n . We can calculate the
surface \area" of B n
2
389499212.012.png 389499212.013.png 389499212.014.png 389499212.015.png
AN ELEMENTARY INTRODUCTION TO MODERN CONVEX GEOMETRY 5
write the integral of a function on R n
Z
f = Z 1
r =0
Z
as
f ( r )\ d " r n− 1 dr:
(1.1)
n
S n 1
The factor r n− 1 appears because the sphere of radius r has area r n− 1 times that
of S n− 1 . The notation \ d " stands for \area" measure on the sphere: its total
mass is the surface area nv n . The most important feature of this measure is
its rotational invariance: if A is a subset of the sphere and U is an orthogonal
transformation of R n ,then UA has the same measure as A . Throughout these
lectures we shall normalise integrals like that in (1.1) by pulling out the factor
nv n , and write
Z
f = nv n Z 1
0
Z
f ( r ) r n− 1 d ( ) dr
n
S n 1
where = n− 1 is the rotation-invariant measure on S n− 1 of total mass 1. To
nd v n , we integrate the function
exp
x i
X
n
x
7!
2
1
both ways. This function is at once invariant under rotations and a product of
functions depending upon separate coordinates; this is what makes the method
work. The integral is
Z
f = Z
Y
n
Y
Z 1
e −x i = 2 dx i = p 2 n :
e −x i = 2 dx =
n
n
1
1
−1
But this equals
nv n Z 1
0
Z
e −r 2 = 2 r n− 1 ddr = nv n Z 1
0
e −r 2 = 2 r n− 1 dr = v n 2 n= 2 n
2 +1 :
S n 1
Hence
n= 2
n
2
+1 :
This is extremely small if n is large. From Stirling's formula we know that
n
2
v n =
+1
p 2 e −n= 2 n
2
( n +1) = 2 ;
so that v n is roughly
r 2 e
n
n
:
To put it another way, the Euclidean ball of volume 1has radius about
r n
2 e ;
which is pretty big.
n
389499212.016.png 389499212.017.png 389499212.018.png 389499212.019.png 389499212.020.png 389499212.021.png 389499212.022.png 389499212.023.png 389499212.024.png 389499212.025.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin