2012 OCHMIAN i in Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Fruits of Two Cultivars of Blue Honeystucke (Lonicera careulea L.) in Relation to their Degree of Maturity and Harvest date.PDF

(531 KB) Pobierz
Available online at www.notulaebotanicae.ro
Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309
Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2012, 40(1):155-162
Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici
Cluj-Napoca
Chemical Composition and Physical Characteristics of Fruits of Two Cultivars
of Blue Honeysuckle ( Lonicera caerulea L.) in Relation to their
Degree of Maturity and Harvest Date
Ireneusz OCHMIAN, Katarzyna SKUPIEŃ, Józef GR AJKOWSKI,
Miłosz SMOLIK, Krystyna OSTROWSKA
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland; ireneusz.ochmian@zut.edu.pl
Abstract
he aim of study was to compare yield, fruit quality, chemical composition and fruits colour of berries of two blue honeysuckle
(Lonicera caerulea L.) cultivars of Polish bred ‘Wojtek’ and ‘Brązowa’ collected at the beginning and at the end of harvest season,
respectively. On average, ‘Wojtek’ yielded 1565 g per bush, whereas ‘Brązowa’ 1941 g. During the fruit ripening process, considerable
changes were found in the fruit colour. Fruits of both cultivars became darker and their colour changed from green and yellow to red
and blue. With the changes in fruit colour, considerable changes in irmness also occurred. Fruit ripening reduced fruit irmness and
puncture resistance. For both genotypes, the berries of late harvest were bigger and richer in soluble solids and total polyphenol, however,
they showed decreased irmness, lower acidity, and L-ascorbic acid content. Nevertheless the time of harvest, ‘Wojtek’ berries surpassed
‘Brązowa’ fruit regarding soluble solids, titratable acidity and L-ascorbic acid content (for late-crop berries of both cultivars 14.1>12.6%,
3.4>2.7 g citric acid 100 g 1 , and 76>56 mg 100 mL -1 . Further, ‘Wojtek’ berries showed higher total polyphenol content (149.30 and
183.66 mg∙100 g -1 , for early and late ripening fruit, respectively) compared to that of ‘Brązowa’ (125.51 and 175.67 mg 100 g -1 ). Among
phenolics, anthocyanins made the substantial group ranging from 94.47 mg 100 g -1 (‘Brązowa’ berries of early harvest) to 141.96 mg 100
g -1 (late ‘Wojtek’ fruit).
Keywords: chemical composition, cultivar, fruit colour, fruit size, Lonicera caerulea , phenolics
pasova et al. , 2007), Lithuania (Zhilinskayte et al. , 2005),
Canada (Lefol, 2007), USA (hompson and Chaovana-
likit, 2006), and in Poland (Ochmian et al. , 2008; Smolik
et al. , 2010). In Japan, high prices make haskap products
special for souvenirs and gits for special occasions (Lefol,
2007). he great advantage of the blue honeysuckle is early
ripening a few weeks before strawberries. he plants bear
at a very young age and the fruit are easily shaken of at
harvest time. hey may be ideally suited for mechanized
harvesting since they do not sucker and have bushes of a
similar size to other fruits that are harvested by machines.
he plants appear to have few insect pests and diseases,
making it a worthwhile crop to be considered for organic
production (Bors, 2008b). he plants are frost-resistant
and the bushes are not damaged even when the tempera-
ture decreases beneath -40°C, whereas the expanded low-
ers are not injured at -8°C. he fruits are elongated with an
elliptic or cylindrical shape that is covered with an abrad-
ing wax bloom. hey have a lavour commonly described
as a combination of blueberries and raspberries. he natu-
ral accessions and varieties provide a large range of taste,
tartness, sweetness, and acidity (Lefol, 2007). Honeysuck-
le berries are used in a wide range of products including
juice, wine, pastries, jams, dairy products and are eaten
fresh. he fruits are rich in phenolics, anthocyanins and
Introduction
According to diferent references, the genus Lonicera
( Caprifoliaceae ) comprises from 150 (Kumar et al., 2005)
to more than 200 species (Naugžemys et al., 2007), which
are native to Siberia, North Eastern Asia, and Japan. Some
species in this genus are used as ornamental and edible
plants. Berries have been long harvested from wild plants
in regions of Russia, China, and Japan (hompson and
Chaovanalikit, 2006). However, in the scientiic literature,
the taxonomic classiication of the species bearing edible
fruits, especially of Lonicera caerulea , is not unequivocal
(Chaovanalikit et al., 2004; Plekhanova, 2000). Lonic-
era caerulea , the blue honeysuckle, is also dubbed hon-
eyberry, sweet berry honeysuckle, edible honeysuckle,
haskap, haskup, hasukappu or haskappu. In the language
of the Ainu people, the Aboriginal people of Hokkaidu
Island, haskap means ‘lots of little things on the top of the
branches’ (Bors, 2008a; Lefol, 2007). Blue honeysuckle
plants have been used for ages in Asia for their medicinal
properties. During the past several decades, research in
Russia and Japan has resulted in cultivars being selected
for commercial production (hompson and Chaovana-
likit, 2006,). Lately, breeding works have been also carried
out in the Czech Republic (Řezniček, 2007), Belarus (Ru-
926243997.050.png 926243997.061.png 926243997.072.png 926243997.083.png 926243997.001.png 926243997.002.png 926243997.003.png 926243997.004.png 926243997.005.png 926243997.006.png 926243997.007.png 926243997.008.png
 
Ochmian I. et al. / Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2012, 40(1):155-162
156
vitamin C (Chaovanalikit et al. , 2004; Pigul, 2005; Rop et
al. , 2011). Consumption of high amounts of antioxidant
substances may have a positive impact on human health,
particularly the prevention of cancer and inlammatory
diseases (Gazdík et al. , 2008). Haskap berries are believed
to have a variety of therapeutic efects as reducing blood
pressure, decreasing the risk of heart attack, preventing os-
teoporosis and anaemia, preventing children hyperactiv-
ity, providing curative efects for malaria and gastrointesti-
nal disorders, slowing the aging process (Lefol, 2007). he
chemical composition of fruits determining their sensory
attributes and pro-health properties is afected by environ-
mental factors, harvest date, and genotype (Hoppula and
Karhu, 2006; Poll and Petersen, 2003; Reyes-Carmona et
al. , 2005). he purpose of this study was to evaluate the
efect of harvest date on the yield, fruit size and colour
and irmness, as well as soluble solids, titratable acidity,
L-ascorbic acid, and phenol content for two honeysuckle
cultivars of Polish bred, ‘Wojtek’ and ‘Brązowa’.
under conventional agronomic treatments adequate to
low soil requirements of the species. he water irrigation
was applied on ‘as needed’ basis during each vegetative
season. Because Lonicera plants are resistant to pathogen
diseases ‘by nature’ no chemical protection was applied.
he ripe berries were collected consecutively. he fruit
mass, irmness, colour, soluble solids, titratable acidity and
L-ascorbic acid content were measured on fresh berries
soon ater each harvest. Phenolics composition was evalu-
ated for berries collected at the beginning and the end of
cropping season and the analyses were performed on fruits
packed in polyethylene bags and stored at -32°C.
he fruit weight was measured with RADWAG WPX
4500 electronic scales (0.01 g accuracy) and fruit irmness
was measured with a FirmTech 2 apparatus (BioWorks,
USA). he irmness and p uncture resistance of the skin
of 100 randomly selected berries from each replicate was
expressed as a gram-force causing fruit surface to bend 1
mm. Puncture were made using a stamp with a diameter
of 3 mm.
Titratable acidity was determined by titration of a wa-
ter extract of fruit juice with 0.1 N NaOH to an end point
of pH 8.1 (measured with an Orion 720 A pH meter; Ori-
on Research Incorporated, USA). Soluble solids content
was determined with an Abbé refractometer. L-ascorbic
acid and nitrates content was measured with a RQlex 10
relectometer (Merck) and expressed as mg per 100 mL
fruit juice.
Material and methods
he experiment was undertaken in the Experimental
Station at Rajkowo (north-west Poland)-West Pomera-
nian University of Technology in Szczecin, in 2009-2010
years. he two-years old blue honeysuckle bushes were
planted on 2005 in a brown podsolic soil rich in the nutri-
ents, thus only nitrogen fertilisation was performed at the
total dose of 40 kg N per ha. he plants were cultivated
Fig. 1. Example of diagram of HPLC phenolics proile of blue honeysuckle fruit
1- neochlorogenic acid; 2- chlorogenic acid; 3- 3,5-dicafeoylquinic acid; 4- unidentiied
lavonol (r. t. 26 min); 5- quercetin-3-rut; 6- quercetin-3-glu; 7- unidentiied lavonol (r. t.
32 min); 8- cyanidin 3-5-diglu; 9- cyanidin-3-glu; 10 cyanidin-3-rut; 11- peon-3-glu; 12-
luteolin-7-O-α-glu
926243997.009.png
Ochmian I. et al. / Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2012, 40(1):155-162
157
he HPLC analyses of polyphenols were carried out
with HPLC apparatus consisting of a Merck-Hitachi
L-7455 diode array detector (DAD) and quaternary pump
L-119 7100 equipped with D-7000 HSM Multisolvent
Delivery System (Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). he runs
were monitored for phenolic acids at 320 nm, lavonols
and luteolin glucoside at 360 nm, and anthocyanin glyco-
sides at 520 nm (Fig. 1). Retention times and spectra were
compared to that of pure standards and total polyphenols
content was expressed as mg per 100 g fruit tissue. Stan-
dards of anthocyanidin glycosides were obtained from
Polyphenols Laboratories (Norway), while, for phenolic
acids, lavonols and luteolin glucoside from Extrasynthese
(France).
Fruit colour was measured in a transmitted mode
through Konica Minolta CM-700d spectrophotometer.
Measurements were conducted in CIE L * a * b * system (Fig.
2), through a 10° observer type and D65 illuminant.
Chemical analyses were carried out in three replicates.
he randomized block experimental design was used with
three replicates (four bushes per a plot). he results ob-
tained were subjected to statistical analysis using Statis-
tica 9 (Statsot, Poland). he results were evaluated by the
Duncan test. he diferences between the means at p< 0.05
were considered signiicant.
Results and discussion
In each year of the experiment, fruits of both cultivars
were harvested six or seven times (Fig. 3). ‘Wojtek’ berries
started to ripen earlier than ‘Brązowa’ (on May 20) and the
last harvest was carried out on June 10. ‘Brązowa’ berries
were collected from June 1 to June 29 when air tempera-
tures were higher (Tab. 1).
he yield of ‘Wojtek’ ranged from 97 g per bush (begin-
ning of harvest) to 522 g per bush (the middle of harvest)
and the total yield amounted 1565 g per bush on average.
Fig. 2. CIE L*a*b* chromaticity diagram
L* (100 white, 0 black); a* (-100 green, +100 red); b* (-100 blue , +100 yellow)
Fig. 3. Yield and one-fruit weight of blue honeysuckle at diferent harvest times (average for
2009-2010)
926243997.010.png
Ochmian I. et al. / Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2012, 40(1):155-162
158
‘Brązowa’ berries, 33% increases in diameter and length
were found. he early ripening berries developed when air
temperatures were lower (Tab. 1 and 2). Moreover, higher
number of fruits per bush at the beginning of fruiting re-
sulted in nutrient competition that could have contributed
to the lowering of weight and size of early harvested hon-
eysuckle berries. However, these data are contradictory
to the indings of Ochmian et al. (2007) for strawberries
and for highbush blueberries of Ścibisz et al. (2003) that
berry size decreases through the harvest period. A reduc-
tion in irrigation might result in smaller fruits at harvest in
open-ield trials of strawberries (Kirnak et al ., 2003) and
apricot trees (Torrecillas et al ., 2008). However, in this
experiment, honeysuckle bushes were supplied with drip
irrigation until the end of cropping that was suitable for
fruit development.
he irmness of honeysuckle berries was inluenced
by the harvest date (Tab. 2 and 3). For both cultivars, the
fruit of early harvest showed higher irmness than the ones
collected late. Fruit size enlargement observed for late-
crop ‘Wojtek’ and ‘Brązowa’ berries and it was concurrent
with 14% decline in their irmness as compared to berries
collected 25-30 days earlier. he decrease in fruit irm-
ness during ripening is a common occurrence. According
to Skupień et al. (2009), the early harvested fruit of other
cultivars were harder if compared to the ones collected
late. Nunes et al. (1995) found that irmness of strawber-
ries cooled immediately ater harvest was greater than
those cooled ater 6 hours, but the diferences in irmness
between harvests (beginning of harvest period and one
week later, respectively) were not signiicant.
he damage of fruit skin is detrimental because it af-
fects negatively the appearance that is especially important
for fruits produced for fresh market purpose. However, no
signiicant diferences in the force needed to damage the
fruits were found. hey are quite low for the blue-berried
honeysuckle, which means that fruits are susceptible to
damage. No reports on this subject are available in the lit-
erature; however, results of the author’s own experiments
in this paper show that fruits of this species are relatively
susceptible to puncture injury. Blackcurrant skin was dam-
aged under the pressure of over 120 G mm -1 , while some
cultivars of northern highbush blueberry were damaged
only at 140 G mm -1 (in press).
he physical parameters of fruits were signiicantly
afected by the degree of fruit ripening (Tab. 3). Fruits
from both cultivars under analysis darkened, which is con-
irmed by the change of the L * parameter, which ranged
from 59.99 to 56.12 in unripe fruits. he lowest value
(21.08) was found in ‘Wojtek’ cultivar fruits just before
harvest. he a * parameter in unripe fruits had negative
values (-23.07; -21.43), which is a sign of the green col-
or. Fruits became red in the ripening process, and the a *
parameter assumed a positive value. he greatest changes
were observed for the b * parameter. Its values ranged from
39.87 (‘Brązowa’) to 42.83 (‘Wojtek’), which reveals the
Tab. 1. he mean air temperatures of April and June in 2009
and 2010
Temperature ( ° C)
Month
IV
V
VI
IV
V
VI
10 days
1
7.2
11.8
18.9
7.9
12.2
15.7
Year
2009
Year
2010
2
11.5
13.8
19.4
9.2
13.4
18.7
3
11.3
18.8
16.6
10.5
15.3
18.2
For ‘Brązowa’ the lowest yield per bush was 122 g (begin-
ning of cropping ), while the highest 512 g (the last but
one harvest) totaling for 1941 g per bush (Fig. 3).
Bors (2008b) reported that the yield for 3- and 4-year-
old honeysuckle seedlings was in the range of 0.5-0.75 kg
per bush. Older plants can yield 1-5 kg per bush (Lefol,
2007; Ochmian and Grajkowski, 2007). he mass and size
of berries play an important role in the evaluation of their
quality and merits for customer attractiveness. One berry
weight of some cultivars grown in Russia was reported as
0.5 g, whereas Japanese cultivars can achieve 2.4 g (Arus
and Kask, 2007). One-fruit weight of the Russian geno-
type honeysuckle, grown in Oregon (USA), is varied from
1 to 2 g (Hummer, 2006). he berries of diferent cultivars
difered in their weight and dimensions in this research.
On average, one-fruit weight of ‘Brązowa’ berries was
higher (1.15-1.76 g ) than ‘Wojtek’ (0.69-1.17 g ). How-
ever, for both cultivars, a common trend was observed that
berries of late harvests had higher one-fruit mass (Fig. 3)
and bigger size (Tab. 2).
Late-cropped ‘Wojtek’ berries showed 41% increase
in diameter and 26% increase in fruit length compared
to fruit collected at the beginning of season, whereas, for
Tab. 2. Fruit size, irmness and puncture resistance of the skin
of two blue honeysuckle cultivars
Cultivar
‘Wojtek’
Characteristics
‘Brązowa’
Mean
Harvest
beginning
Fruit
diameter
[mm]
8.7±0.9 a/A a
11.4±1 a/B
10.0 a
End
of the harvest
12.3±0.7 b/A
15.2±0.8 b/B
13.7 b
Harvest
beginning
Fruit
length
[mm]
18.7±0.8 a/B
18.4± 0.7 a/A
18.5 a
End
of the harvest
23.7± 1.1 b/A
24.5± 0.9 b/A
24.1 b
Harvest
beginning
172±29 b/A
201±41 a/B
186 B
Firmness
[G∙mm -1 ]
End
of the harvest
148±15 a/A
174±17 a/B
161 A
Harvest
beginning
Puncture
(cracking)
the skin
[G∙mm -1 ]
78±15 a/A
94±18 a/B
86 A
End
of the harvest
62±12 a/A
75±11 a/A
68 A
a Diferent letters in the same row indicate signiicant diferences at p< 0.05.
Lower case refer to harvest date (for particular cultivar), whereas, capital letters
refer to comparisons of two genotypes
926243997.011.png 926243997.012.png 926243997.013.png 926243997.014.png 926243997.015.png 926243997.016.png 926243997.017.png 926243997.018.png 926243997.019.png 926243997.020.png 926243997.021.png 926243997.022.png 926243997.023.png 926243997.024.png 926243997.025.png 926243997.026.png 926243997.027.png 926243997.028.png 926243997.029.png 926243997.030.png
Ochmian I. et al. / Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2012, 40(1):155-162
159
ries, whereas Kamzolova et al. (2006) reported 1.79-3.24
g citric acid 100 g -1 . For both genotypes evaluated in this
study, berries of late harvest showed a lower acidity com-
pared to the ones collected at an early stage. Also, Poll and
Petersen (2003) observed a decrease of acidity for cherries
picked at late season during harvest. he changes in SS and
TA throughout cropping of both cultivars were relected
in an increase of SS:TA ratio for berries ripening late. he
SS:TA of early harvested berries of ‘Wojtek’ was 2.3:1 and
for ones harvested late, it was 4.1:1. he SS:TA for ber-
ries of ‘Brązowa’ was changed from 2.8:1 to 4.6:1 for late
harvested fruits. hus, late-collected honeysuckle berries
of both cultivars had better sensory attributes. According
to the results obtained, blue honeysuckle berries can be
considered as a rich source of L-ascorbic acid (Tab. 4). he
divergence observed between berries harvested early of
‘Wojtek’ and ‘Brązowa’ fruits harvested late ranged from
113 to 56 mg 100 mL -1 , respectively. Late-crop berries of
both cultivars showed a signiicant decrease of L-ascorbic
acid content, changed from 27% for ‘Brązowa’ and 33%
presence of compounds that make the colour yellow. he
values of the b * parameter were negative in unripe fruits
and the fruits showed blue and red colours (Tab. 3).
Soluble solids (SS) were found between 9.6-12.6%
in this study and are in accordance with the indings of
Kamzolova et al. (2006) for honeysuckle cultivars grown
in Belarus. Nevertheless, at the time of harvest date,
‘Wojtek’ berries showed a higher amount of soluble solids
than ‘Brązowa’ berries (Tab. 4). Additionally, it was found
for both cultivars that berries collected early that ripen
at lower temperatures have lower SS content than fruits
of fruits harvested late (by 31-37%). Similarly, Poll and
Petersen (2003) observed low values of SS for sour cher-
ries in the cold and rainy seasons. In general, honeysuckle
berries are rich in organic acids. High amounts of acids
impart a speciic taste for blue honeysuckle berries resem-
bling, for some people, bilberries with a distinct lavour
of acidity. Total acid content (TA) varied from 2.7 to 4.4
g citric acid 100 g -1 in this research (Tab. 4). Skupień et
al. (2007) determined 2.98 g citric acid for ‘Zielona’ ber-
Tab. 3. Color fruit, irmness and puncture resistance of the skin of two blue honeysuckle cultivars in dependence on harvest time
Characteristics of fruits
Cultivar
Unripe fruits/green
Beginning of fruit ripening
Ripe fruits
L*
a*
b*
L*
a*
b*
L*
a*
b*
CIE L*a*b* chromaticity
59.88
-23.07
42.83
41.15
2.67
19.77
21.08
1.43
-25.40
Firmness
[G∙mm -1 ]
423±34 c b
278±52 b
161±25 a
‘Wojtek’
Puncture (cracking) the skin
[G∙mm -1 ]
335±18 c
142±36 b
75±21 a
CIE L*a*b* chromaticity
56.12
-21.43
39.87
39.18
9.94
17.35
25.73
4.27
-22.49
Firmness
[G∙mm -1 ]
449±40 c
305±48 b
184±37 a
‘Brązowa’
Puncture (cracking) the skin
[G∙mm -1 ]
311±23 c
176±51 b
92±29 a
Sample color
b Diferent letters in the same row indicate signiicant diferences at p< 0.05
Tab. 4. he chemical composition in honeysuckle berries in dependence on harvest time fruit quality of two blue honeysuckle
cultivars
Cultivar
Characteristics
‘Wojtek’
‘Brązowa’
Mean
Harvest beginning
10.3±0.3 a/B c
9.6±0.2 a/A
9.9 A
Soluble solids
[%]
End of the harvest
14.1±0.3 b/B
12.6±0.2 b/A
13.3 B
Harvest beginning
4.4±0.3 b/B
3.4±0.2 a/A
3.9 B
Titratable acidity
[g citric acid∙100g -1 ]
End of the harvest
3.4±0.3 b/A
2.7±0.3 a/A
3.0 A
L-ascorbic acid
[mg∙100 mL -1 ]
Harvest beginning
113±10 b/B
77±9 a/A
95 B
End of the harvest
76±6 b/A
56±6 a/A
66 A
Harvest beginning 12.3±2.8 b/B 8.5±1.6 a/B 10.4 B
End of the harvest 7.2±2.1 a/A 5.6±1.4 a/A 6.4 A
c Diferent letters in the same row indicate signiicant diferences at p< 0.05. Lower case refer to harvest date (for particular cultivar), whereas, capital letters refer to
comparisons of two genotypes
Nitrates
[mg∙100 mL -1 ]
926243997.031.png 926243997.032.png 926243997.033.png 926243997.034.png 926243997.035.png 926243997.036.png 926243997.037.png 926243997.038.png 926243997.039.png 926243997.040.png 926243997.041.png 926243997.042.png 926243997.043.png 926243997.044.png 926243997.045.png 926243997.046.png 926243997.047.png 926243997.048.png 926243997.049.png 926243997.051.png 926243997.052.png 926243997.053.png 926243997.054.png 926243997.055.png 926243997.056.png 926243997.057.png 926243997.058.png 926243997.059.png 926243997.060.png 926243997.062.png 926243997.063.png 926243997.064.png 926243997.065.png 926243997.066.png 926243997.067.png 926243997.068.png 926243997.069.png 926243997.070.png 926243997.071.png 926243997.073.png 926243997.074.png 926243997.075.png 926243997.076.png 926243997.077.png 926243997.078.png 926243997.079.png 926243997.080.png 926243997.081.png 926243997.082.png 926243997.084.png 926243997.085.png 926243997.086.png 926243997.087.png 926243997.088.png 926243997.089.png
 
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin