An Investigation of the Laws of Thought by George Boole.pdf

(1374 KB) Pobierz
296085225 UNPDF
ProjectGutenberg’sAnInvestigationoftheLawsofThought,byGeorgeBoole
ThiseBookisfortheuseofanyoneanywhereatnocostandwith
almostnorestrictionswhatsoever.Youmaycopyit,giveitawayor
re-useitunderthetermsoftheProjectGutenbergLicenseincluded
withthiseBookoronlineatwww.gutenberg.net
Title:AnInvestigationoftheLawsofThought
Author:GeorgeBoole
ReleaseDate:February16,2005[EBook#15114]
Language:English
Charactersetencoding:PDF
***STARTOFTHISPROJECTGUTENBERGEBOOKLAWSOFTHOUGHT***
ProducedbyDavidStarner,JoshuaHutchinson,DavidBowden
andtheOnlineDistributedProofreadingTeam.
i
ANINVESTIGATION
OF
THELAWSOFTHOUGHT,
ONWHICHAREFOUNDED
THEMATHEMATICALTHEORIESOFLOGICAND
PROBABILITIES.
BY
GEORGEBOOLE,LL.D.
PROFESSOROFMATHEMATICSINQUEEN’SCOLLEGE,CORK.
ii
TO
JOHNRYALL,LL.D.
VICE-PRESIDENTANDPROFESSOROFGREEK
INQUEEN’SCOLLEGE,CORK,
THISWORKISINSCRIBED
INTESTIMONYOFFRIENDSHIPANDESTEEM
PREFACE.
——
ThefollowingworkisnotarepublicationofaformertreatisebytheAuthor,
entitled,“TheMathematicalAnalysisofLogic.”Itsearlierportionisindeed
devotedtothesameobject,anditbeginsbyestablishingthesamesystemof
fundamentallaws,butitsmethodsaremoregeneral,anditsrangeofapplica-
tionsfarwider.Itexhibitstheresults,maturedbysomeyearsofstudyand
reflection,ofaprincipleofinvestigationrelatingtotheintellectualoperations,
thepreviousexpositionofwhichwaswrittenwithinafewweeksafteritsidea
hadbeenconceived.
ThatportionofthisworkwhichrelatestoLogicpresupposesinitsreadera
knowledgeofthemostimportanttermsofthescience,asusuallytreated,and
ofitsgeneralobject.OnthesepointsthereisnobetterguidethanArchbishop
Whately’s“ElementsofLogic,”orMr.Thomson’s“OutlinesoftheLawsof
Thought.”Totheformerofthesetreatises,thepresentrevivalofattentionto
thisclassofstudiesseemsinagreatmeasuredue.Someacquaintancewiththe
principlesofAlgebraisalsorequisite,butitisnotnecessarythatthisapplication
shouldhavebeencarriedbeyondthesolutionofsimpleequations.Forthestudy
ofthosechapterswhichrelatetothetheoryofprobabilities,asomewhatlarger
knowledgeofAlgebraisrequired,andespeciallyofthedoctrineofElimination,
andofthesolutionofEquationscontainingmorethanoneunknownquantity.
Preliminaryinformationuponthesubject-matterwillbefoundinthespecial
treatisesonProbabilitiesin“Lardner’sCabinetCyclopædia,”andthe“Library
ofUsefulKnowledge,”theformerofthesebyProfessorDeMorgan,thelatter
bySirJohnLubbock;andinaninterestingseriesofLetterstranslatedfrom
theFrenchofM.Quetelet.Otherreferenceswillbegiveninthework.On
afirstperusalthereadermayomitathisdiscretion,Chaptersx.,xiv.,and
xix.,togetherwithanyoftheapplicationswhichhemaydeemuninvitingor
irrelevant.
Indierentpartsofthework,andespeciallyinthenotestotheconcluding
chapter,willbefoundreferencestovariouswriters,ancientandmodern,chiefly
designedtoillustrateacertainviewofthehistoryofphilosophy.Withrespect
tothese,theAuthorthinksitpropertoadd,thathehasinnoinstancegiven
iii
PREFACE.
iv
acitationwhichhehasnotbelieveduponcarefulexaminationtobesupported
eitherbyparallelauthorities,orbythegeneraltenoroftheworkfromwhich
itwastaken.Whilehewouldgladlyhaveavoidedtheintroductionofanything
whichmightbypossibilitybeconstruedintotheparadeoflearning,hefeltit
tobeduebothtohissubjectandtothetruth,thatthestatementsinthetext
shouldbeaccompaniedbythemeansofverification.Andifnow,inbringing
toitsclosealabour,oftheextentofwhichfewpersonswillbeabletojudge
fromitsapparentfruits,hemaybepermittedtospeakforasinglemoment
ofthefeelingswithwhichhehaspursued,andwithwhichhenowlaysaside,
histask,hewouldsay,thatheneverdoubtedthatitwasworthyofhisbest
eorts;thathefeltthatwhateveroftruthitmightbringtolightwasnota
privateorarbitrarything,notdependent,astoitsessence,uponanyhuman
opinion.Hewasfullyawarethatlearnedandablemenmaintainedopinions
uponthesubjectofLogicdirectlyopposedtotheviewsuponwhichtheentire
argumentandprocedureofhisworkrested.Whilehebelievedthoseopinionsto
beerroneous,hewasconsciousthathisownviewsmightinsensiblybewarped
byaninfluenceofanotherkind.Hefeltinanespecialmannerthedangerofthat
intellectualbiaswhichlongattentiontoaparticularaspectoftruthtendsto
produce.Buthetruststhatoutofthisconflictofopinionsthesametruthwill
butemergethemorefreefromanypersonaladmixture;thatitsdierentparts
willbeseenintheirjustproportion;andthatnoneofthemwilleventuallybe
toohighlyvaluedortoolightlyregardedbecauseoftheprejudiceswhichmay
attachtothemereformofitsexposition.
Tohisvaluedfriend,theRev.GeorgeStephensDickson,ofLincoln,the
Authordesirestorecordhisobligationsformuchkindassistanceintherevision
ofthiswork,andforsomeimportantsuggestions.
5,Grenville-place,Cork,
Nov.30th.1853.
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin