ProjectRiskAssessment.PDF
(
18 KB
)
Pobierz
PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT
Template Reference (1):
Project:
Reference (2):
Stage:
Date:
Project Manager:
Version:
The risk factors, ie those which affect the probability that the project will be completed on time and
within the agreed contract/budget, and will deliver a quality compliant End Product, arise from six
sources - Project Management, the Project Staff, The Nature of the Project itself, the Maturity
of the Development Organisation (Internal and Third Party Suppliers), Customer/Contract
Arrangements, and Third Party Suppliers.
The risks associated with each of these elements are itemised and estimated below in the form
of statements typifying low and high risk, on either side of a scale of 0.1 to 4.0. The assessed risk under
column (b) has been multiplied by the weighting factor inserted in column (e) to provide a total
score for each risk factor identified.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Element Ref:
Low Risk
Scale
High Risk
Sugg
Weight
Total
0.1 to 4.0
Weight
Used
Score
Project
1 Full time and experienced Project Manager
Part time and inexperienced Project Mgr
5 to 7
0
Mgt
2 Customers are experienced and likely
Inexperienced customer management
4 to 6
0
to be active participators in the project
with little participation expected
Project
3 Customer involvement/support
Little Customer involvement expected
3 to 5
0
Staff
anticipated in the Development
plus limited knowledge available
4 High standard of supervision and a narrow
Span of supervision wide and the level
4 to 6
0
span of control within the Project Team
of control expected to be poor
5 The project team is of
An inexperienced project
5 to 7
0
good quality, experienced, and with the
team, lacking experience and the
right blend of appropriate skills
appropriate key skills
6 Staff are assigned full-time to the project
Staff have other responsibilities
3 to 5
0
7 Low turnover of project staff
High turnover of project staff
4 to 7
0
Nature
8 Staff are experienced in contributing to
Quality Reviews have not been carried
4 to 6
0
of the
Quality Reviews, and are committed to the
out in the past and project staff have
Project
achievement of quality Products
no experience of quality assessment
9 A typical project with a straightforward
A project life-cycle that has many
4 to 6
0
life-cycle involving no novel
unusual features
or untoward features
10 The final outcome has no new or unique
Pioneering new approaches will be
4 to 6
0
features
incorporated into the eventual outcome
eg untried equipment, packages etc
11 Current main operations at will be
Significant impact on mainstream
3 to 5
0
only minimally be affected
operations
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Element
Ref:
Low Risk
Scale
High Risk
Sugg
Weight
Total
1 to 4
Weight
Used
Score
12 The requirements are, or will be, well
Requirements are (expected to be)
3 to 5
0
established and well documented by the
poorly understood, documented and
Customer
presented by the Customer
13 There will be little or no modification
Extensive modification to existing
3 to 5
0
needed to existing standards
standards/approaches will be required
14 Little development work is
Other projects are being developed
3 to 5
0
being undertaken concurrently
concurrently with this project
15 Little or no dependence on existing or
There is dependence on facilities not
3 to 6
0
developing facilities which are not under
under the control of staff on this project
the control of staff on this project
16 The project duration is less than 6 months
Project duration more than 6 months,
2 to 5
0
or there are only a small number of work-
or there is a high number of workdays
days compared with completed projects
compared with other completed projects
17 Little or no constraint on completion date
There is a mandatory completion date
2 to 6
0
beyond the availability of resources
built within the contract
18 Plans and estimates are based on reliable
Plans and estimates are based on
4 to 7
0
data from similar work/projects
unreliable data - essentially "green field"
19 Estimates have been prepared using well
Approximations of estimates have been
4 to 7
0
tried and well documented standards
used, based on unproven standards
20 This is the first or second attempt at this
There have been two or more attempts to
4 to 8
0
particular project - ie no history of long-
deliver the undertaking from this project
term or consistent failure
ie it has a history of failure
21 Few Customer Departments will be
Many Customer Departments will be
4 to 6
0
affected by the final outcome
affected by the final outcome
22 The work will affect few sites, which are
Many remote Customer sites will be
3 to 5
0
easily accessible to the development team
involved and affected by the project
23 There will be minor impact on the
There will be significant impact on the
3 to 6
0
Customer's current or future day-to-day
Customer's day-to-day work during the
work during the development lifecycle
project
24 A well developed set of Project
Few standards are available to the
4 to 7
0
Management Standards are available
Project Team
Maturity
25 A well developed Quality Policy, actively
A visible Quality Policy
3 to 6
0
of the
supported by senior managers, exists
is ill defined, or not present
Organis-
ation
26 Clear delegation of authority is practised
There is central management control
3 to 6
0
by Management
with little empowerment and delegation
27 Staff will make use of the published
Although Project Management Standards
3 to 6
0
Project Management Standards
exist, staff are not expected to
make use of them
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Element
Ref:
Low Risk
Scale
High Risk
Sugg
Weight
Total
1 to 4
Weight
Used
Score
Custo-
28 The Customer has a full understanding
The Customer demonstrates a poor
4 to 7
0
mer and
of the Requirement and its impact
understanding of the Requirement
Contract
29 There will be little or no
Extensive modifications to Customer's
3 to 5
0
modification needed to the Customer's
existing facilities will be necessary
existing facilities
30 An agreed Contract is in existence - Terms
No formal contract documentation exists
4 to 7
0
and Conditions are well documented and
Terms and Conditions have been not
understood by all parties concerned
discussed, agreed and published
31 There have been previous dealings with the
There have been difficulties when dealing
3 to 6
0
Customer and the contract has been
with this Customer on earlier contracts
brought to a successful and satisfactory
conclusion
Third
32 Suppliers are known and have a
New, untried suppliers with no
4 to 7
0
Party
good track record
track record
Supplier
33 Only one, well established supplier will be
Multiple suppliers (with sub-contractor
3 to 5
0
used to provide the services
elements) are anticipated
34 Supplier(s) have an established project
Suppliers project management arrange-
2 to 5
0
management system based on PRINCE,
ments are ad-hoc with little definition
SPOCE, SPOCETTE or equivalent
35 A supplier contract is in existence
Informal arrangements only have been
4 to 7
0
Terms and Conditions accepted
agreed
36 The Supplier has an established Quality
The Supplier has no published QMS
3 to 6
0
Management System to BS/EN/ISO9000
37 Future level of Supplier performance is
Future level of Supplier performance is
3 to 5
0
expected to be excellent
un-assessable - not enough is known
TOTALS:
0
0
0
The project is assessed as VERY HIGH RISK if
0 is GREATER than:
0
(Column (f))
(Column (e) x 2.6)
The project is assessed as LOW RISK if
0 is LESS than:
0
(Column (f))
(Column (e) x 2.0)
There are 37 questions on this Risk Assessment - Please State how many you excluded
0
or failed to answer when completing the form
How many additional questions did you include in the Risk Assessment?
0
The Risk Factor for your project is
0
A Risk Factor of less than 2.0 indicates a low risk project.
A Risk Factor between 2.0 to 2.2 indicates a moderate risk project
A Risk Factor between 2.2 to 2.6 indicates a high risk project; over 2.6 indicates a very high risk
Plik z chomika:
usmiechlosu
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
AuthoriseClosure.PDF
(3 KB)
AuthoriseInitiation.PDF
(3 KB)
AuthoriseContinuation.PDF
(3 KB)
AuthoriseExceptionPlan.PDF
(3 KB)
brief.PDF
(48 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
Pliki dostępne do 01.06.2025
Pliki dostępne do 19.01.2025
Pliki dostępne do 21.01.2024
! ★ Nintendo DS 5000 GIER !!!
► Legend of the Five Rings
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin