reading 2 B2.pdf
(
1344 KB
)
Pobierz
You are going to read a magazine
article about scientists
in the cinema
and on television.
For
Questions
1-13,
choose
from the films and programmes
A-G
in the box. The letters may be
chosen
more than once. When
more than one answer
is required,
these
may be given in any
order. There
is an example
at the beginning
(0).
A
Frankenstein
Paper 1 Reading texts can be from
advertisements,
B
Dr Cyclops
correspondence,
fiction,
C
It Conquered
the World
o
informational
material
(brochures,
guides,
Them!
manuals,
etc.), messages, newspaper
and
E
Back to the Future
magazine
articles or reports.
F
Apollo
13
G
The Dean
In which film or TV programme:
does a scientist invent a new kind of vehicle?
do scientists use difficult language?
does the scientist make people smaller?
do scientists make insects bigger?
is the scientist eaten by a plant?
do scientists often find out new things?
does a scientist
I
0
I
E
I
I
1
I
I
I
21
I
I 31
I
I
41
I
I 51
I
I
61
I
create
something
from pieces?
I 71
I 81
is the scientist
well-intentioned
but dangerous?
I
91
110
I
111
I
1121
is science
portrayed
realistically?
is the figure
of the mad scientist
established?
did people
find the scientist
funny?
1131
does a very clever
scientist
do great harm?
CAN SCIENTISTS SHAKE OFF THEIR
MEDIA IMAGE?
Am
eri
c
an
physicis
ts
are
ca
mp
aig
ning
to
change
the
w
a
y
th
e
y
a
re
p
or
t
r
ayed
o
n
sc
r
een, b
u
t
Geoff
Brown
believes the
absent
-
mind
e
d
p
rofesso
r
is
h
e
r
e to
st
a
y
.
Pro
f
e
s
so
r
R
o
bert
Par
k
o
f t
he U
ni
v
e
r
s
it
y
of Mary
l
a
nd
h
as
T
he
l
ang
ua
ge
of s
ci
ence
i
s
a
n
o
th
er
pro
bl
e
m
.
Eith
er
2u
n
c
hed
a
n
attack
o
n
the po
p
u
l
ar
im
age
of scie
n
tis
t
s
a
s
scr
i
pt
w
r
i
t
e
r
s
fool
th
e genera
l
a
ud
ie
n
ce
with
m
ea
nin
g
l
e
s
s
-' o
w
n
b
y
m
ovies
and
televis
i
on
.
Scie
n
t
i
s
t
s
,
h
e
says, a
r
e
n
o
n
s
e
n
se
,
or
a
n
e
x
p
e
r
t
i
s
hir
ed
to.
t
eac
h
ever
y
o
n
e
t
h
e
'
"
n
e
ral
l
y
po
r
trayed
a
s
forge
tf
u
l
,
s
h
o
rt
-sig
ht
e
d
an
d
eve
n
55
au
th
e
n
t
i
c
t
ech
n
i
c
a
l
te
rm
s
.
Film-m
a
k
ers
w
ant
wor
d
s
to
:
:
=
zy
.
m
a
t
c
h
th
e
r
ea
l
i
t
y of
their
se
ts
a
nd
s
pe
c
ial
ef
fect
s, w
ith t
he
Th
e
pr
o
f
ess
o
r
i
s ri
gh
t,
of
c
o
u
rse.
T
houg
h
th
ere
h
ave
r
es
ult
t
ha
t
h
a
lf th
e ta
lk
in Ap
o
llo
13
i
s
ri
g
ht o
ver peo
pl
e
'
s
·
e
n
a
f
ew serio
u
s atte
m
p
t
s
t
o
t
r
e
a
t
s
c
ie
nt
i
s
t
s with res
p
ec
t
,
h
ea
d
s
.
A
t l
eas
t P
rofesso
r
Pa
r
k
r
ecogn
i
zes
t
he p
r
oble
m
.
'
W
e
3l
e
mode
l
for
m
o
s
t
m
o
v
ie
s
c
i
entists
r
emains
the
sc
r
ee
n
ca
nn
o
t
seem
t
o free ou
r
selves of
th
e jargo
n
wh
i
c
h
we
u
se,
'
he
v
e
rs
io
n of Ma
r
y S
h
e
ll
ey
's
Fr
an
ke
n
s
te
i
n
.
Br
il
l
i
an
t m
a
n
, of
60
sa
ys. '
O
u
r fa
mi
l
i
es have go
t
use
d t
o i
t
,
but n
o
t th
e pu
bli
c
.
'
:
o
ur
s
e,
b
ut
so o
b
sess
ed
wit
h m
a
k
i
n
g
a
m
o
n
s
t
ro
u
s
Boris
S
o w
he
n w
ill
t
h
e
r
e
b
e a television s
e
ries ab
ou
t sc
i
e
nti
sts?
K
a
rl
of
f
fr
o
m
s
p
are
b
o
d
y
pa
r
t
s
that
h
e
se
e
m
s
quit
e
Th
e A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n As
soc
iati
o
n
fo
r th
e A
dvan
ce
ment
of
Scien
ce
:m
co
nc
e
r
n
e
d
b
y
w
h
a
t h
is awf
ul cr
e
a
ti
o
n i
s
l
ike
l
y
t
o ge
t up t
o.
h
as
b
ee
n
he
lpin
g
t
o ex
pl
ore t
he
poss
ibili
t
i
es.
Th
e
res
ult i
s
F
ra
nk
e
n
s
t
ei
n
h
ad even
m
ad
d
e
r
movie co
n
temporarie
s
.
The Dean
,
a projec
t
e
d
sho
w
a
b
o
u
t a
r
esearch ce
n
tre whe
r
e
Th
e
re
was
D
r Morea
u
,
w
hose spec
i
a
l
it
y
was ge
n
et
i
cs:
hi
s
65
scie
nt
is
t
s
re
gul
arly
m
ake
exci
t
in
g
discoveries
.
Brit
i
sh
:
: .
abo
r
a
t
o
r
y
was
an
is
l
a
nd
of c
r
e
atur
es
t
h
a
t
we
re
ha
l
f a
nim
a
l
prod
u
ce
r
A
d
ri
an
Malo
n
e
has
b
een g
i
v
e
n the jo
b
of se
lli
ng
m
d
ha
l
f
hum
a
n.
O
r ho
w a
b
o
ut D
r
Alex
a
nd
e
r
T
h
orke
l
a
s a
th
e
id
e
a t
o US
tel
e
vi
s
ion
. T
h
e o
nl
y
rule
s,
h
e s
a
ys, are
n
o
t
to
:
o
l
e
m
o
del
? In
Dr C
y
clops
h
e
mi
g
ht b
e
t
he w
orld
's g
reat
est
t
e
ll
l
i
es
a
bo
ut
sc
i
ence
a
nd
ne
ve
r
t
o
b
o
r
e
p
e
ople
.
S
o
m
e
·
iol
o
gis
t
,
bu
t
hi
s fo
n
d
n
ess for s
h
ri
n
k
i
n
g p
eo
pl
e
t
o the s
i
ze of
co
nt
rad
i
ction,
s
ur
e
l
y
?
~hi
ck
e
ns
d
oes
n
ot suggest a candi
d
ate fo
r
t
h
e Nobel
Pri
z
e
.
P
o
stwar
m
ov
i
e scie
n
tis
t
s we
r
e main
l
y of a differe
nt
sort
.
-:
1le
y
worke
d
o
n
to
p-
secret g
o
ver
nm
e
n
t jo
b
s a
nd u
s
u
a
l
ly
"
a
n
ted
t
o
d
o
good - thou
g
h th
e
ir m
e
ntal
sta
bilit
y
was st
il
l
u
es
ti
o
nabl
e
.
S
cien
ce
in
t
h
e
1
9
5
0s was w
i
de
l
y acce
pted
as
:
:
tle
ne
w
front
i
e
r
,
b
u
t t
hi
s
was
a
lso a ti
m
e of fea
r
a
n
d
_
;
Jar
a
no
ia, and some sc
i
entists wa
n
ted to p
u
s
h
t
h
e
· u
n
dari
e
s too
f
ar,
th
r
e
ate
n
i
ng b
ot
h n
atio
n
a
l
sec
ur
i
t
y a
nd
:
:
he
ms
e
l
ves. M
en li
ke
Le
e Va
n Cl
eef
in
It C
on
q
u
e
red th
e
W
o
rld
: h
e re
g
a
rd
e
d
t
he 'it
'
as
a
c
l
ose
per
so
n
a
l friend
, a
n
d
en
de
d u
p
as a
me
a
l
fo
r thi
s large vege
t
a
b
4
1
fro
m
Ve
nu
s.
F
i
lm after fil
m r
epea
t
ed
th
e
c
onflict
:
th
e m
en with g
un
s
:-ee
n
t
o
s
h
oo
t d
ow
n
t
h
e alie
n
; t
h
e
s
cie
n
ti
s
t
s
eage
r t
o
l
ea
rn
:
:
-
o
m
a s
up
erio
r
civ
il
izat
i
o
n
.
S
c
i
ence
-fi
ctio
n film
s o
f
the
Z
i
f
r
i
es
al
so re
flected
t
h
e
s
us
p
ic
ion that sci
en
ti
s
t
s we
r
e
takin
g
:
00
ma
n
y c
h
a
nce
s wi
th n
at
ure
. They
ma
y ge
n
u
i
ne
l
y
ha
v
e
:
=
.
='
l
iev
ed t
h
a
t
a
t
o
mi
c power was a safe
,
c
l
ean e
n
e
r
gy so
ur
ce
- u
t
peo
p
le were s
t
ar
t
i
n
g
t
o
h
ave
t
he
i
r do
u
bts. So
m
a
n
y
:
ruc
le
ar
t
es
t
s
t
ook plac
e
in
N
ew Mexico t
h
at t
h
e re
s
ult, in
T
he
m!
, w
a
s
an arm
y o
f gi
ant a
nt
s
.
O
nce h
or
r
o
r
Look again at the way these e
x
pressions a
r
e
used
i
n the te
x
t
1
-
7
.
and comp
l
ete
definitions
unconcerned
(line
12)
genetics (line
14)
absent-minded
(line 40)
breakthrough
(l
i
ne 48)
research (line 49)
authentic
(line
55)
(line
59)
jargon
An
document
is known
to
be genuine
and o
r
iginal.
..
..
.
.
...
.
..
.
.....
..
.
.
....
.
........
is the study of how
characteristics
pass from
one generation
to the
ne
x
t
.
A
i5 an impo
r
tant
advan
c
e
o
r
discove
r
y, especially in science
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
....
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
.
....
.
.
.
...
a
nd scienc
e
-ficti
o
n
film
s
had
esta
blish
ed
people
are forgetf
u
l
and
-
:
h
e
s
t
e
r
eoty
p
e of
th
e
m
ad o
r
abse
nt-minded
scie
nti
s
t
,
;
;
o
m
e
dies
b
egan to
s
prea
d it
a
r
o
u
nd. Yo
un
g
s
ters in
t
he
1
960s
:
:
:e
l
i
g
hte
d
i
n
a
D
is
n
ey co
m
edy about the di
s
t
racte
d
do not pay attention
to
w
hat
they
a
r
e doing
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
...
.
..
.
....
.
..
.
....
.
means no
t t
o be
w
o
rr
ie
d
inventor
o
f
'
fl
ub
ber',
or f
l
yi
n
g ru
bb
er
.
Twe
nt
y
-
five
y
e
ars
l
a
t
er
,
a
about
something,
when
maybe yo
u
s
hou
l
d
b
e
.
Gff
e
re
nt
ge
n
e
rati
on
h
a
d
a g
r
ea
t l
a
u
g
h wat
c
h
i
ng
C
h
r
i
s
toph
er
-
=
-
oy
d's
c
ra
z
e
d in
ven
t
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
time m
a
chin
e
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
..
.
.....
.
.
...
..
is technical
o
r
specialized
ca
r in Back
t
o
language.
.
.
th
e F
ut
ure.
A
ser
i
o
u
s
is the study o
r
sc
i
e
nt
ist,
a
l
l scri
p
tw
ri
te
r
s
kn
ow, is a
b
o
ri
ng
(
I
e
.
True
,
t
h
e mo
m
ent
of
b
reakthroug
h
mi
ght pro
du
ce
h
igh
investigation
of a subjec
t
i
n order to discover
~
a;
but h
ow
d
o yo
u h
a
ndle
th
e y
ear
s o
f re
searc
h
,
t
h
e
new facts
.
5:
::
. e
t
ra
il
s,
th
e
midnight h
o
ur
s
hun
c
h
e
d
o
ve
r keyb
oa
rds
a
nd
Do you prefer
serious or light-hearted
science
-
_
t
-
t
u
b
e
s?
f
i
ction
f
i
lms? Why?
Plik z chomika:
Syjka
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
aspects of love.pdf
(4422 KB)
test 1 B2.pdf
(2063 KB)
infinitive participle passive.pdf
(2214 KB)
conditionals mixed.pdf
(1636 KB)
tenses mixed.pdf
(1482 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
Grammatyka
Opowiadania
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin