reading 2 B2.pdf

(1344 KB) Pobierz
You are going to read a magazine
article about scientists
in the cinema
and on television.
For
Questions
1-13, choose
from the films and programmes
A-G
in the box. The letters may be
chosen
more than once. When
more than one answer
is required,
these
may be given in any
order. There
is an example
at the beginning
(0).
A
Frankenstein
Paper 1 Reading texts can be from
advertisements,
B
Dr Cyclops
correspondence,
fiction,
C
It Conquered
the World
o
informational
material
(brochures,
guides,
Them!
manuals,
etc.), messages, newspaper
and
E
Back to the Future
magazine
articles or reports.
F
Apollo
13
G
The Dean
In which film or TV programme:
does a scientist invent a new kind of vehicle?
do scientists use difficult language?
does the scientist make people smaller?
do scientists make insects bigger?
is the scientist eaten by a plant?
do scientists often find out new things?
does a scientist
I
0 I E
I
I 1 I
I
I 21
I
I 31
I
I 41
I
I 51
I
I 61
I
create
something
from pieces?
I 71
I 81
is the scientist
well-intentioned
but dangerous?
I 91
110 I
111 I
1121
is science
portrayed
realistically?
is the figure
of the mad scientist
established?
did people
find the scientist
funny?
1131
does a very clever
scientist
do great harm?
823589766.001.png
CAN SCIENTISTS SHAKE OFF THEIR
MEDIA IMAGE?
Am eri c an
physicis ts
are
ca mp aig ning
to
change
the
w a y
th e y
a re
p or t r ayed
o n sc r een, b u t Geoff
Brown believes the
absent - mind e d
p rofesso r
is h e r e to st a y .
Pro f e s so r
R o bert
Par k o f t he U ni v e r s it y
of Mary l a nd
h as
T he
l ang ua ge
of s ci ence
i s a n o th er
pro bl e m .
Eith er
2u n c hed
a n attack
o n the po p u l ar
im age
of scie n tis t s
a s
scr i pt w r i t e r s
fool th e genera l
a ud ie n ce
with
m ea nin g l e s s
-' o w n b y m ovies
and
televis i on .
Scie n t i s t s ,
h e
says, a r e
n o n s e n se ,
or
a n
e x p e r t
i s hir ed
to. t eac h
ever y o n e
t h e
' " n e ral l y
po r trayed
a s forge tf u l ,
s h o rt -sig ht e d
an d
eve n 55 au th e n t i c
t ech n i c a l
te rm s .
Film-m a k ers
w ant
wor d s
to
: : = zy .
m a t c h
th e r ea l i t y of their se ts a nd s pe c ial ef fect s, w ith t he
Th e
pr o f ess o r
i s ri gh t,
of c o u rse. T houg h
th ere
h ave
r es ult t ha t h a lf th e ta lk in Ap o llo
13 i s ri g ht o ver peo pl e ' s
·
e n a f ew serio u s atte m p t s
t o t r e a t s c ie nt i s t s with res p ec t ,
h ea d s . A t l eas t P rofesso r
Pa r k r ecogn i zes t he p r oble m .
' W e
3l e
mode l
for m o s t
m o v ie
s c i entists
r emains
the
sc r ee n
ca nn o t seem t o free ou r selves of th e jargo n wh i c h we u se, ' he
v e rs io n of Ma r y S h e ll ey 's Fr an ke n s te i n .
Br il l i an t m a n , of 60 sa ys. ' O u r fa mi l i es have go t use d t o i t , but n o t th e pu bli c . '
:
o ur s e,
b ut
so o b sess ed
wit h m a k i n g
a m o n s t ro u s
Boris
S o w he n w ill t h e r e b e a television s e ries ab ou t sc i e nti sts?
K a rl of f
fr o m
s p are
b o d y
pa r t s
that
h e
se e m s
quit e
Th e A m e r i c a n As soc iati o n
fo r th e A dvan ce ment
of Scien ce
:m co nc e r n e d
b y w h a t h is awf ul cr e a ti o n i s l ike l y t o ge t up t o.
h as b ee n he lpin g
t o ex pl ore t he poss ibili t i es. Th e
res ult i s
F ra nk e n s t ei n
h ad even m ad d e r
movie co n temporarie s .
The Dean ,
a projec t e d
sho w a b o u t a r esearch ce n tre whe r e
Th e re
was D r Morea u ,
w hose spec i a l it y
was ge n et i cs:
hi s 65 scie nt is t s
re gul arly
m ake
exci t in g
discoveries .
Brit i sh
: : . abo r a t o r y
was an is l a nd of c r e atur es
t h a t we re ha l f a nim a l
prod u ce r
A d ri an
Malo n e
has b een g i v e n the jo b of se lli ng
m d ha l f hum a n.
O r ho w a b o ut D r Alex a nd e r T h orke l
a s a
th e id e a t o US tel e vi s ion . T h e o nl y rule s, h e s a ys, are n o t to
: o l e m o del ? In Dr C y clops
h e mi g ht b e t he w orld 's g reat est
t e ll l i es a bo ut
sc i ence
a nd
ne ve r
t o
b o r e
p e ople .
S o m e
· iol o gis t , bu t hi s fo n d n ess for s h ri n k i n g p eo pl e t o the s i ze of
co nt rad i ction,
s ur e l y ?
~hi ck e ns d oes n ot suggest a candi d ate fo r t h e Nobel Pri z e .
P o stwar m ov i e scie n tis t s we r e main l y of a differe nt sort .
-: 1le y worke d o n to p- secret g o ver nm e n t jo b s a nd u s u a l ly
" a n ted t o d o good - thou g h th e ir m e ntal sta bilit y was st il l
u es ti o nabl e . S cien ce in t h e 1 9 5 0s was w i de l y acce pted as
: : tle ne w front i e r , b u t t hi s was a lso a ti m e of fea r a n d
_ ; Jar a no ia, and some sc i entists wa n ted to p u s h t h e
· u n dari e s too f ar, th r e ate n i ng b ot h n atio n a l sec ur i t y a nd
: : he ms e l ves. M en li ke Le e Va n Cl eef in It C on q u e red th e
W o rld : h e re g a rd e d t he 'it ' as a c l ose per so n a l friend , a n d
en de d u p as a me a l fo r thi s large vege t a b 4 1 fro m Ve nu s.
F i lm after fil m r epea t ed th e c onflict : th e m en with g un s
:-ee n t o s h oo t d ow n t h e alie n ; t h e s cie n ti s t s eage r t o l ea rn
: : - o m a s up erio r civ il izat i o n . S c i ence -fi ctio n film s o f the
Z i f r i es al so re flected t h e s us p ic ion that sci en ti s t s we r e takin g
: 00 ma n y c h a nce s wi th n at ure . They ma y ge n u i ne l y ha v e
: = . =' l iev ed t h a t a t o mi c power was a safe , c l ean e n e r gy so ur ce
- u t peo p le were s t ar t i n g t o h ave t he i r do u bts. So m a n y
: ruc le ar t es t s t ook plac e in N ew Mexico t h at t h e re s ult, in
T he m! , w a s an arm y o f gi ant a nt s .
O nce h or r o r
Look again at the way these e x pressions a r e
used i n the te x t
1 - 7 .
and comp l ete
definitions
unconcerned
(line
12)
genetics (line
14)
absent-minded
(line 40)
breakthrough
(l i ne 48)
research (line 49)
authentic
(line 55)
(line 59)
jargon
An
document
is known
to
be genuine
and o r iginal.
.. .. . . ... . .. . ..... .. . . .... . ........
is the study of how
characteristics
pass from
one generation
to the
ne x t .
A
i5 an impo r tant
advan c e
o r discove r y, especially in science .
. . . .. . . .... . ... . . . . . . ... . .... . . . ...
a nd scienc e -ficti o n
film s had
esta blish ed
people
are forgetf u l
and
-
: h e s t e r eoty p e of th e m ad o r abse nt-minded scie nti s t ,
; ; o m e dies b egan to s prea d it a r o u nd. Yo un g s ters in t he 1 960s
: : :e l i g hte d i n a D is n ey co m edy about the di s t racte d
do not pay attention
to w hat
they
a r e doing .
. . . .. . . . . . .... . ... . .. . .... . .. . .... .
means no t t o be w o rr ie d
inventor
o f
' fl ub ber',
or f l yi n g ru bb er .
Twe nt y - five
y e ars
l a t er ,
a
about
something,
when
maybe yo u s hou l d
b e .
Gff e re nt ge n e rati on h a d a g r ea t l a u g h wat c h i ng C h r i s toph er
- = - oy d's c ra z e d in ven t o r o f t h e time m a chin e
. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . ..... . . ... ..
is technical
o r specialized
ca r in Back
t o
language.
. .
th e F ut ure.
A ser i o u s
is the study o r
sc i e nt ist,
a l l scri p tw ri te r s
kn ow, is a b o ri ng
( I e . True , t h e mo m ent
of b reakthroug h
mi ght pro du ce h igh
investigation
of a subjec t
i n order to discover
~ a;
but h ow d o yo u h a ndle
th e y ear s o f re searc h ,
t h e
new facts .
5: :: . e t ra il s, th e midnight h o ur s hun c h e d
o ve r keyb oa rds a nd
Do you prefer
serious or light-hearted
science -
_ t - t u b e s?
f i ction
f i lms? Why?
823589766.002.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin