technology_notes_2008.pdf

(1961 KB) Pobierz
Technology notes
Technology notes
WaterAid/Caroline Penn
976630452.001.png 976630452.002.png 976630452.003.png 976630452.004.png
TECHNOLOGY NOTES
Section 1 Introduction
Section Considerations before design
Section 3 Hygiene education
Section 4 Water resource development
Section 5 Gravity schemes
Section 6 Hand-dug wells
Section 7 Tubewells and boreholes
Section 8 Handpumps
Section 9 Spring protection
Section 10 Rainwater harvesting
Section 11 Sub-surface dams
Section 1 Sanitation
Section 13 Disinfection
Section 14 Treatment of water
INTRODUCTION
Technology notes
These Technology Notes have been prepared following many general enquiries for technical information having been
received by WaterAid over the years.
Their purpose is to give an outline of the technologies used by WaterAid on long-term development projects in Africa and
Asia, and to show alternatives which might be appropriate in different circumstances. It may be possible to determine from
the notes the technology which would be appropriate in a particular location.
If it is proposed to proceed with the design and construction of a project using any of the principles set out in these notes, it
is strongly recommended that further details be obtained from a specialist or from the reference books which are listed at the
end of the relevant section.
Acknowledgements
These notes have been prepared within WaterAid for use by its own staff and by those organisations which have requested
technical help from WaterAid.
In order to illustrate the points raised in the text, drawings, sketches and charts have been collected from various sources. It
is not always possible to locate the original source of the illustrations, but WaterAid wishes to acknowledge that some have
been taken from publications listed in the references at the end of sections.
WaterAid thanks the relevant authors and organisations and trusts that mutual cooperation will continue.
3
CONSIDERaTIONS bEfORE DESIGN
Introduction
There are many non-technical points which should be considered fully by the supporting agency and the community before
any scheme proceeds, in order to ensure long term sustainability and maximum beneit of the scheme to the health and
quality of life of the community.
The involvement, by supporting agencies, of communities in the design, implementation, monitoring, review and evaluation
of a project enhances their sense of ownership. In turn, this empowers people to make decisions, relevant to their
perceptions and needs, concerning the work which will help to safeguard the long-term sustainability of the project.
A commitment by the local community to participate fully in the scheme is now considered by WaterAid to be essential in all
the projects which it supports. This means commitment at all stages. The stages can be considered to be: appraising the
project, including the setting up of a baseline survey from which to measure improvements; setting its aims and objectives;
designing it with the involvement of all the stakeholders; and setting up a monitoring system.
During the irst stage, before any construction begins, consideration must be given to the inal ownership; the management
of day to day operations, however small; the method of payment for any repairs and maintenance; and the possibility of
future extensions when neighbours see the beneits of the project.
Unless the scheme is to supply a formal institution such as a school or hospital, or a refugee or resettlement camp, the inal
owners should be the community which it serves.
Early formation of a committee
It is essential that the community is involved in decision making at an early stage and that local people determine the type of
scheme, as far as it is technically possible, which they feel will serve them best.
This is best achieved by the formation of a committee, in which the whole community, whether a small town or just a group of
homes around a spring, must be involved. Every effort should be made to make this committee truly representative of all the
interests in the community, with men and women being equally represented on it. This committee will make decisions
regarding all aspects of the project; these are likely to include such matters as:
j The type of scheme
j The location of water supply points, wells, boreholes, tapstands, etc
j The method of construction
j Whether the initial contribution should consist of cash or labour
j The method of payment to accumulate funds for eventual repairs
j The daily maintenance and cleanliness of the system
Hygiene education
Whether it is a water supply and/or a sanitation scheme that is proposed, the ultimate aim is to improve the health and
quality of life of the community. Technical developments or improvements will give maximum beneit only if they are part of a
wider hygiene education programme. This may involve the changing of long held attitudes and practices and may well take
considerably longer to achieve than the actual construction of the scheme.
Hygiene education must be a community activity so that everyone goes forward together without any group being left
behind. It is usual for the women to be the ones who are primarily concerned with the health of the family, and education will
normally concentrate on them. However, it is often the children who are the easiest to educate regarding the beneits of
hygiene education, and then they insist on changes being made within the family unit.
The community’s contribution to the scheme
Decisions will have to be made by the supporting agency, in cooperation with the community’s committee, regarding the
nature of the community’s contribution to the setting up of the scheme. This could, and probably should, include the
provision of labour for construction, under the supervision of a suitably qualiied person. A inancial contribution may be
required towards the initial capital cost, or to set up a fund for future maintenance.
4
Costs of operation and maintenance
The cost of operating the project when it is inished must be considered at an early stage. This may be little more than the
cost of payment for the occasional services of a caretaker to clean the apron and steps at a protected spring, handpump or
borehole. However, it might be considerably more, such as the cost of maintenance, and possible replacement of parts, for a
handpump, or the operation of a diesel driven pump, including the provision of fuel or even the provision and dosing of
chemicals for water treatment.
The following list of headings to be considered was used in the preparation of a maintenance budget for self suficiency for a
gravity scheme, from a spring source, supplying 50,000 people in rural Ethiopia.
j Salaries
j Protective clothing
j Ofice staff and caretakers
j Hand tools
j Maintenance
j Meter replacements
j Labour costs
j Consultants – (to advise on management and engineering)
j Materials for repairs
j Training
j Ofice costs
j Motor bikes
j Maintenance – structure and equipment
j Replacement costs
j Stationery and printing
j Running cost
j Transport cost
Two other items to consider (not applicable in this particular
example project) are diesel fuel and electricity.
j Truck hire to carry out repairs
j Caretakers attending the ofice
Payment for water
It is essential that a community understands that it is necessary to make some payment for the water that is used.
The method of payment will vary according to the type of system and the nature of the users.
It may be payment to a caretaker for each jerrycan collected, probably the most equitable way. However, this requires
honesty and integrity from both the caretaker in handling cash and the user in offering payment. A monthly charge per
household is easier to collect, but visitors, nomads or travellers will not contribute. Also, excess water used for irrigation or
cattle watering is not covered by this method of charging, and there is no incentive to prevent wastage.
All accounts should be managed by some person who is respected within the community and should regularly be made
available for public scrutiny. The community must decide what method, or combination of methods, it will use to build up
funds for future maintenance.
Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring of the project is a continual process: to check whether or not it is progressing in accordance with its aims and
objectives; to identify problems as they develop; and to maintain a continual reporting system to all involved.
Provision should be made to carry out a inal evaluation of the project on completion. This process will examine its
performance, to ind out whether or not its aims and objectives have been achieved, and what effect and impact it has had on
the local people and their environment.
REFERENCES:
1 Scinivasan L (1990) Tools for Community Participation
PROWESS/UNDP
Davis, Garvey and Wood (1993) Developing and Managing Community Water Supplies
Oxfam
3 Petty et al (1995) Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainer’s Guide
IIED
5
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin