CVO_116.pdf

(1651 KB) Pobierz
No. 116, March 23, 2011
OPENINGS
WHAT’S HOT AND WHAT’S NOT?
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-TRK+0
9ZPL+N+PZPP0
9-ZPPVLPSN-+0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-+PZP-+-+0
9+PSN-ZPN+-0
9PVLQ+LZPPZP0
9TR-+-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
Brilliant
tactical ights
By IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris
Frequency
We cover rounds ive through eight of the special inal
edition of the Amber Blindfold and Rapid Tournament,
where Aronian is in the lead. More spectacular and
theoretically relevant chess was played in the German
Bundesliga.
WHAT’S HOT?
Score
In comparison to last week, White did much better against the Petroff.
Instead of 5.¤c3 White went for the main line and won in both Carlsen-
Kramnik and Ivanchuk-Gelfand. Black, on the other hand, hit back in the
Berlin Endgame in Gashimov-Aronian. Below we return to the Italian line
we examined in CVO 100 and have a look at the Modern Defence. Topalov-
Grischuk (Najdorf 6.f3 e5 7.¤b3), Karjakin-Anand (Najdorf 6.¥e3 e5 7.¤f3)
and Anand-Nakamura (French MacCutcheon) are recommended as study
material.
Shirov keeps amazing us with fantastic games, and even though most of
the world's top players are in Monaco, the Game of the Week was played
in the Bundesliga. In the diagram position Black went for 10...¦c8. Shirov-
Fridman was another brilliant tactical fight.
The ease with which Carlsen beat Kramnik with Black, and Aronian beat
Anand with White, both in the English Opening, is remarkable. Below we
have more on 1.c4 and on the Slav Exchange variation. In the PGN file you'll
find McShane-Nikolic, in which the related 1.g3 was played, and the only
game the tournament leader has so far lost: Aronian-Grischuk (Benoni).
Source: Megabase + TWIC, 2500+ only
Even though Shirov played a truly amazing game again, Black suffered in two other Semi-Slav games this week. In Erdos-Schenk it was
shown that the seemingly innocent Moscow Variation, usually described as a positional variation, can end in a tactical disaster for Black if
he doesn't watch out. In Babula-Hoffmann White took revenge for the defeat exactly a year
before, again in a very sharp Anti-Moscow. Maybe Black should focus on 13...a5 in this line.
WHAT’S NOT?
1 of 4
788981269.051.png 788981269.062.png 788981269.073.png 788981269.081.png 788981269.001.png 788981269.002.png 788981269.003.png 788981269.004.png 788981269.005.png 788981269.006.png 788981269.007.png 788981269.008.png 788981269.009.png 788981269.010.png 788981269.011.png 788981269.012.png 788981269.013.png 788981269.014.png 788981269.015.png 788981269.016.png 788981269.017.png 788981269.018.png 788981269.019.png 788981269.020.png 788981269.021.png 788981269.022.png 788981269.023.png 788981269.024.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 116, March 23, 2011
More ire on board
He may not be playing in the last edition of the Amber tournament, but that hasn’t stopped
Shirov showing more Fire on Board . The following game is yet another amazing attacking
game by a true genius. The best defence, leading to a draw, was practically impossible to ind.
GAME OF THE WEEK
anything better than perpetual check.
22...f3!
22...¥xe4?! is inaccurate, in view of 23.f3 ¦c5
24.¦xd3 (24.fxe4? f3) 24...¦h5 25.£c2 and
White stays in the game.
23.¥e5?
The decisive mistake. White should have played
23.£xd3 though after 23...fxg2 (23...¥xe4?
24.£c3) 24.f3 £h1+ 25.¢f2 ¦cd8 26.¤d4
(26.£c3? ¦xd2+ 27.£xd2 ¦xf3+! 28.¢xf3 g1£+)
26...e5 Black remains on top.
23...¥xe4
23...fxg2?! 24.¥h2 is less clear.
24.¥g3 £h6!
Leaving h5 free for one of the ¦s.
25.¤d4
25.¤d6 can be met by 25...¦c5! 26.¤xe4 ¦h5
27.¥h4 ¦xh4 28.¤g3 ¦h2 with a devastating
attack.
25...¦c5 26.gxf3 ¦xf3!
Black could still have spoiled everything with
26...¦h5? in view of 27.¢g2!.
27.¦xd3
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+K+0
9ZP-+-+-ZPP0
9-ZP-+P+-WQ0
9+-TR-+-+-0
9-+PSNL+-+0
9+P+R+RVL-0
9P+-+-ZP-+0
9+Q+R+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
27...¦xd3?!
Shirov s move is sufficient, though quicker
would have been 27...£h1+! 28.¢xh1 ¦xg3+
29.¢h2 (29.¤f3 ¦h5#) 29...¦g2+ 30.¢h1 ¦h5+
31.¦h3 ¦xh3#.
28.f3 £e3+ 29.¥f2
29.¢g2 ¥xf3+ 30.¤xf3 £xf3+ with mate to
follow.
29...¦g5+ 30.¢f1 ¦xd1+ and White resigned,
because of 31.£xd1 ¥d3+ 32.¤e2 £xf3 which
is hopeless for White. 0–1
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+R+-TRK+0
9ZPL+-WQ-ZPP0
9-ZP-VLP+-+0
9+-SN-+P+-0
9-+P+P+-+0
9+PSN-ZP-+-0
9PVL-TRLZPPZP0
9+Q+R+-MK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
17.g3 doesn't stop the march of the f-pawn: 17...
f4 18.gxf4 (18.exf4 ¥xf4!; 18.¤b5 ¥b8 19.gxf4
¦xf4!) 18...¥xf4! 19.exf4 ¦xf4 and Black retains
a powerful attack on the kingside.
17...¥xh2+! 18.¢xh2 £h4+ 19.¢g1 f4
Black has to play accurately, since 19...¦f6? is
met by 20.¦d8+ ¦xd8 21.¦xd8+ ¢f7 22.g3 £h3
23.¥f1 and White holds on.
20.¤b5
Taking control over f6. Alternatives aren t better:
20.exf4 £xf4 21.¥f1 e3! 22.fxe3 £xe3+ 23.¢h2
¦f6 24.¦d8+ ¦xd8 25.¦xd8+ ¢f7 and Black wins.
20.¥f1 allows 20...¦f6! 21.¦d8+ ¦xd8 22.¦xd8+
¢f7 23.¤xe4 ¦h6 with a winning attack.
20...¤d3
Initially Shirov intended to play 20...fxe3 21.fxe3
£f2+ 22.¢h2 £h4+ but didn t see anything
better than repeating moves.
21.¥xd3
21.¥f1? fails to 21...fxe3 22.fxe3 ¤f2! and Black
wins.
21...exd3 22.e4?
Closing the long diagonal, but allowing the
further advance of the f-pawn. 22.£xd3? is met
by 22...¥xg2! 23.¢xg2 f3+. Best seems 22.exf4!
¥xg2 (22...¦xf4 23.£xd3 ¥xg2 24.¢xg2 ¦g4+
25.£g3 is playable for White.) 23.¢xg2 £g4+
24.¢f1 (24.¢h1? ¦c5) 24...£h3+ 25.¢g1 ¦xf4
26.¦xd3 ¦g4+ 27.¦g3 ¦xg3+ 28.fxg3 £xg3+
29.¢h1 ¦f8 (29...¦c5? 30.¦d8+ ¢f7 31.£f1+
wins.) 30.£e4 £h3+ and Black doesn t have
Chuchelov,V (2565) - Shirov, A (2749)
Bundesliga (Mülheim), 20.03.2011
D45, Semi-Slav, Anti-Meran
1.¤f3 d5 2.d4 ¤f6 3.c4 c6 4.¤c3 e6 5.e3
¤bd7 6.£c2 ¥d6 7.b3
The most solid approach. 7.g4 was
popularized by the black player back in the
day, while nowadays 7.¥d3 is the most popular
continuation (see CVO 113).
7...0–0 8.¥e2 b6 9.0–0 ¥b7 10.¥b2 ¦c8
Black has several other moves at his disposal,
of which 10...£e7 is the most common.
11.¦ad1
The thematic central push 11.e4 is a bit
premature, as after 11...¤xe4 12.¤xe4
dxe4 13.£xe4 ¤f6 14.£h4 c5 15.¦ad1 ¤e4
16.£h5 cxd4 17.¥xd4 £e7 18.¥d3 f5 Black
was absolutely fine in Caruana-Gustafsson,
Rogaska Slatina 2009.
11...c5
Another option is 11...£e7 12.¦fe1 (12.e4!?)
12...c5 13.cxd5 cxd4 14.¦xd4 ¤xd5 15.¤xd5
¥xd5 16.£b1 ¥c5 17.¦dd1 ¥b4 which was
perfectly fine for Black in Flores-Leko, Khanty-
Mansiysk 2010.
12.dxc5
12.cxd5 cxd4! 13.¦xd4 ¤xd5 is unproblematic
for Black.
12...¤xc5 13.£b1
In case of 13.¤b5 Black generates nice play by
13...¥b8 14.¤g5 ¤fe4 15.¤xe4 ¤xe4 16.¥d3 f5
with mutual chances.
13...£e7 14.¤g5
After 14.cxd5 ¤xd5 Black s pieces coordinate
more harmoniously.
14...¤fe4
14...h6? fails tactically to 15.¤xd5! exd5
16.¥xf6.
15.¤gxe4 dxe4 16.¦d2 f5
Black needs to operate directly, as otherwise
he might end up in a strategically bad position,
as happened after 16...¥b8 17.¦fd1 £g5 18.g3
£f5 19.¥f1 ¤d3 20.¥g2± Kramnik-Caruana,
Moscow blitz 2010.
17.¦fd1
CHUCHELOV - SHIROV
2 of 4
788981269.025.png 788981269.026.png 788981269.027.png 788981269.028.png 788981269.029.png 788981269.030.png 788981269.031.png 788981269.032.png 788981269.033.png 788981269.034.png 788981269.035.png 788981269.036.png 788981269.037.png 788981269.038.png 788981269.039.png 788981269.040.png 788981269.041.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 116, March 23, 2011
THIS WEEK’S HARVEST
Italian Game
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-+R+K+0
9+PVLQ+PZP-0
9-+P+LSNNZP0
9ZPPZP-ZP-+-0
9P+-ZPP+-+0
9VLL+P+N+-0
9-+Q+-ZPPZP0
9TR-+-TRNMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥c4 ¥c5 4.c3 ¤f6 5.b4 ¥b6 6.d3 d6 7.a4 a5 8.b5 ¤e7 9.¤bd2 ¤g6 10.0–0 0–0
11.¥b3 c6 12.¤c4 ¥c7 13.¦e1 ¦e8 14.¤e3 d5 15.£c2 h6 16.¥a3 ¥e6 17.c4 d4 18.¤f1 £d7 19.c5
In CVO 100 we examined a collection of Jobava games with 5.b4 in the Italian Game. This week in the Bundesliga
there were two very interesting encounters that nicely confirm the conclusions we drew a few months ago. In
Fressinet-L'Ami Black again played 7...a6 and had to suffer for 60 moves before he reached a draw. In Feygin-
Gustafsson, Black preferred the more natural 7...a5 and followed our CVO recommendation all the way up
to 13...¦e8. Now Feygin went for 14.¤e3, which seems to be a decent choice, but overall Black's position
remains the more attractive one. 16...¤f4!? is an interesting alternative that has been played successfully in
correspondence chess. The novelty 17.c4! was a surprising choice, but possibly the only way to keep the balance
(an old Dolmatov game continued with 17.¦ad1). Maybe the right follow-up for White would have been 18.¤f5.
In the diagram position it's showtime - have a look for yourself and then check the PGN file for Gustafsson's
marvellous handling of the position.
Caro-Kann/Modern
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+KTR-TR-+0
9ZPP+-ZP-VLP0
9-WQP+-+PSN0
9+-+PZP-+-0
9-SN-+-ZPP+0
9+-SN-+-WQP0
9PZPPVLL+-+0
9+-MKR+-+R0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 g6 2.e4 ¥g7 3.¤c3 c6 4.f4 d5 5.e5 ¤h6 6.¤f3 ¥g4 7.h3 ¥xf3 8.£xf3 f6 9.g4
fxe5 10.dxe5 ¦f8 11.£g3 £b6 12.¥d3 ¤a6 13.¥d2 ¤b4 14.0–0–0 0–0–0 15.¥e2
Vitiugov probably wanted to outplay his lower rated opponent with an offbeat system, but in the diagram position
he was brutally swept off the board by Kraemer in a further thirteen moves. All Black's pieces are misplaced
and his position is one big weakness. On closer examination of the variations, 6...¥g4? seems to be a serious
inaccuracy. The critical move order is 6...f6 with two main lines. Khalifman recommends 7.¥e3 ¥g4 8.¥e2 0–0
9.0–0 ¤d7 10.h3 ¥xf3 11.¥xf3 ¤f5 12.¥f2 fxe5 13.fxe5 e6 14.¤e2 £g5 15.c3 ¦f7 16.£c1 according to the game
Mastrovasilis-Svetushkin, Aghia Pelagia 2004, but here Black seems to be fine after exchanging queens and
doubling rooks. Good old Velimirovic won three games with the more straightforward 7.h3 ¤f5 8.g4 ¤g3 9.¦g1
but after 9...¤xf1 10.¦xf1 0–0 11.¥e3 Black should refrain from the static 11...e6? (Velimirovic-Drazic, Herceg
Novi 2001) and play the dynamic 11...£b6! with nice counterplay. Maybe Black is fine in these lines after all and
White should stick to the more positional approach 4.h3 d5 5.¤f3?
Slav, Exchange
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+LWQK+-TR0
9+PVL-+PVL-0
9P+N+PSNPZP0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-+-ZP-+PZP0
9+-SN-ZPP+-0
9PZP-+-+-WQ0
9+-TR-MKLSNR0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤c3 ¤f6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.¥f4 ¤c6 6.e3 a6 7.¦c1
¥g4 8.f3 ¥c8 9.g4 g6 10.h4 h6 11.£d2 ¥g7 12.£h2 e6 13.¥c7
To be honest, I (RR) have never considered the Exchange Variation a threat to the Slav and so have always
declined to have a look at it. Indeed, various lines have extreme drawing tendencies, though others certainly
contain nasty pitfalls. Just a short glimpse at the diagram shows how completely wrong things can go for Black if
he doesn't know the accurate replies. Instead of Gashimov's 8...¥c8?!, the normal continuation is 8...¥d7. In my
encounter with co-editor Arne Moll I was unpleasantly surprised by his opening choice and hence had to invest a
huge amount of time in dealing with all the ins and outs. Without knowing it I avoided Kramnik's £ sacrifice, which
would have given him long term compensation had he gone for 15.b3!? My choice of 8...¦c8 seems playable as
well, though Arne immediately went for the harmless 9.£b3?! when Black is fine after 9...¤a5! In the Bundesliga
game Landa-Bacrot the latter got into serious trouble after misplaying the opening. The moves 16...¦c8 and
18...¦a8 are a clear sign that something has gone wrong for Black.
English, Four Knights
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-TRK+0
9+PZP-VL-ZPP0
9-SN-+-ZP-+0
9ZPP+L+-+-0
9-+-ZP-+-+0
9ZP-+P+-ZP-0
9-VL-SNPZPLZP0
9TR-+Q+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
1.c4 e5 2.¤c3 ¤f6 3.¤f3 ¤c6 4.g3 d5 5.cxd5 ¤xd5 6.¥g2 ¤b6 7.0–0 ¥e7 8.a3
0–0 9.b4 ¥e6 10.d3 a5 11.b5 ¤d4 12.¥b2 f6 13.¤xd4 exd4 14.¤b1 ¥d5 15.¤d2
The main line of the English Opening has been quite popular lately. In general, many lines arising from 1.d4 are
fine for Black and hence white players try to lure their opponents onto the wrong track by delaying the advance
of the d-pawn. To avoid all of these subtleties, Black's most principled reply is 1....e5. In his book The English
Opening 1 Marin analyses the main line with 10.¦b1, but in Monaco an interesting new idea was found by
Kramnik, who refrained from occupying b1 with the ¦. In the line with 10.d3 a5, he came up with 13.¤xd4 exd4
14.¤b1!? whereas other ¤ retreats haven't promised White anything so far. In the diagram position, Karjakin
initially chose 15...¥xg2, but after 16.¢xg2 £d5 17.¤f3 £xb5 18.¥xd4 White is clearly better as his major pieces
are able to exert pressure on the open files. Four rounds later Karjakin logically attempted to improve with 15...
c5, though he never fully equalised. Our investigations connected with 10...¤d4, mentioned in CVO 113, might
still be a more convenient solution to Black's queenside problems.
3 of 4
788981269.042.png 788981269.043.png 788981269.044.png 788981269.045.png 788981269.046.png 788981269.047.png 788981269.048.png 788981269.049.png 788981269.050.png 788981269.052.png 788981269.053.png 788981269.054.png 788981269.055.png 788981269.056.png 788981269.057.png 788981269.058.png 788981269.059.png
ChessVibes OPENINGS what’s hot and what’s not?
No. 116, March 23, 2011
IT'S YOUR MOVE
XIIIIIIIIY
9RSN-TR-+K+0
9+LWQP+PZPP0
9PZP-VLPSN-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+PSNP+-+0
9ZP-SN-VLP+-0
9-ZP-+L+PZP0
9+-TRQ+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
XIIIIIIIIY
9RSNLWQR+K+0
9ZPP+-+PZP-0
9-+P+-SN-ZP0
9+-+PZP-+-0
9-VLP+-+-+0
9+-SNP+NZP-0
9PZP-VLPZPLZP0
9TR-+Q+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
O
O
LAST WEEK'S SOLUTIONS
XIIIIIIIIY
9RSN-WQ-+-TR0
9ZP-ZPK+P+-0
9LZP-+P+-ZP0
9+-+-ZP-+P0
9-+-ZPQ+-+0
9ZP-+-+-+-0
9-+PVL-+P+0
9TR-+-MK-SNR0
XIIIIIIIIY
Gashimov-Nakamura, Amber Rapid (Monaco) 2011
The position is a mess and Black has to be very careful to prevent a quick loss. With the elegant ¢ move
17...¢c8! Nakamura managed to coordinate his forces and bring his ¢ to relative safety. 18.¤f3 After 18.£xa8??
¥b7 19.£xa7 £xd4 20.¦d1 ¤c6 the white £ is trapped. 18...¥b7 19.£f4 Now in the game Nakamura played
19...¦h7?! and came under pressure, even though he won in the end. 19...¥d5! 20.¦c1 ¥c4! followed by ¢b7
and developing the ¤ would have been a good follow-up, giving Black nice positional compensation for the
pawn.
XIIIIIIIIY
9R+-WQ-TRK+0
9+P+L+-VLP0
9P+-ZP-SNP+0
9ZP-ZPPZP-+-0
9-+-+P+-+0
9+-SNLVLP+-0
9-ZP-WQ-+PZP0
9TR-+-+RMK-0
XIIIIIIIIY
Matlakov-Belous, Russian Ch U-20 (St. Petersburg) 2011
The structure reminds us of a KID/Benoni hybrid. The most important difference is that now a pawn stands
on e5 instead of a ¤. This means the long diagonal is closed and that Black lacks counterplay through ...f5.
Hence, White is able to decide matters on the other side of the board. 17.b4! cxb4 17...b6 18.axb6 cxb4 19.¤a4
a5 20.¤b2 followed by 21.¤c4 is highly problematic for Black. 18.¤a4 ¤h5 19.¦fb1 b5? A horrible move,
accelerating the process. 19...£xa5? 20.¤b6 drops the £. 20.axb6 a5 21.b7 ¦b8 22.¥a6 £e8 23.¤b6 1–0
www.chessvibes.com/openings
ChessVibes Openings is a weekly PDF magazine that covers the latest news on chess openings. Which openings are hot in top
level chess? Which are not? Editors IM Merijn van Delft & IM Robert Ris keep you updated once a week! Why not subscribe
for € 25 a year (that’s less than € 0.50 per issue!). More info can be found at www.chessvibes.com/openings .
© 2009-2011 ChessVibes. Copyright exists on all original material published by ChessVibes. Any copying or distribution (reproduction, via print, electronic format, or in any form whatsoever),
as well as posting on the web, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
4 of 4
788981269.060.png 788981269.061.png 788981269.063.png 788981269.064.png 788981269.065.png 788981269.066.png 788981269.067.png 788981269.068.png 788981269.069.png 788981269.070.png 788981269.071.png 788981269.072.png 788981269.074.png 788981269.075.png 788981269.076.png 788981269.077.png 788981269.078.png 788981269.079.png 788981269.080.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin