1956_Douglas_Walsh_Legal_Decision.pdf

(10122 KB) Pobierz
Cases Decided in the Court of Session, and Also in the Justiciary and House of Lords
1986 SESSION CASES.
THE,COURT OF SESSION,
AND -0 IN THE
COURT OF JUSTICIARY
HOUSE OF LORDS,
EDITOR), D. I. MACLEOD,
R. KING MURRAY, rn~
J. M. PETERSON, ADVOCATES.
EDITED BY
R. C. MACFARLANE, Q.C.
PUBLISHED FOR THE FACULTY OF ADVOCATES
BY
OLIVER AND BOYD
TWEEDDALE COURT, EDINBURGH
REPORTED BY
J. R. FIDDES (ASSISTANT
10010583.002.png
126
CASES DECIDED IN THE 1966 S. C. (H.L.).
July 19, 1966.hee been of (I Very unudohah,and the feat that t h~
pointa
Britth were raised for the first time during the hearing of thia appeel tmggeefe
Oxygen CO. V. that they heve had little, if tmy, proper oomidmtion in the earlier
Waet
Sootlend
El~trioity the whole form of action here b not mieoanceived.
Bo8rd.
ategee of the aeee. There meme to me to be a seriou queation whether
I would dismiss the appeal.
WW,
& my. W.S., Edinburgh-
R. A. -, for CAMPBELL SYITH ~~TEIBON & OLIPHIWT, W.S., Edin-
burgh, W~~oar,
JOHNSTON
c
Glesgow, and BIOOABT,
~
,
LWMSDEN
& Co.. Glesgow.
- Sir Lynn CTngoed-Thomae, Q.0.-5. 61. Noakee--1Emlie.
July 19, 1956. THELORD ADVOCATE,
Donaus WALSH, hrrsuer (Appellant).-
--
welsh V.
aa repreeenting the Wter of Labour and
National Service, Defender (Respondent).-Lord
Adv.
LOK~
Advocate.
ue&Mity to sctuics--E~p
tiow-" RcguIar minister of any religioue denomination "-" Rhguw
denomination "-" Regulor minieter "-Church-Yinbter-NdM
8ervice Act, 1948 (11 and 12 Qeo. VI, cap. 64), First 8cM., par. 2.
The National Servioe Act, 1948, by Fht Sched., par. 2, exempts
from liability to national servioe " a man in holy ordm or a
regular minister of any religioua denomination."
A member of a body of professing Chrietians known aa Jehovah's
Witnessee, holding the appointmenta of pioneer publisher and
congregation servant of that body, brought an action against
the Lord Advocate for declarator (1) that Jehovah's Witnesses
were a religious denomination within the meaning of the etetutory
exemption, and (2) that he, by virtue of hie appointments, wee a
regular minister of that religioua denomination, and consequently
exempt from national service.
The Lord Ordinary (8trachan) having after a proof granted
the first declarator and refused the second, the Lord Advo-
cate, for the purposes of the action, eooepted the deobion of
the Lord Ordinary on the firet point, and, on a reclaiming
motion by the pursuer, the Second Division affied hie decision
on the second point.
HeM (aff. judgment of the Second Division) that the pursuer
was not " a regular miniater of a religious denomination " within
the meaning of the statute, in reapect more eapecrslly that he
and othere holding similar appointmenta had not a statue which
set them apart from the other members of the denomination
and placed them above the othere in spiritual matters.
Opinione that the organisation of Jehovah's Witneasee wae of
such a kind as to create no such office ae a " regular minister "
in the statutory sew.
Dictum of Lord Anderson in Ouy v. Mackenna, 1917 J.C. 69, at
p. 63, dkapproved by Lord Keith of Avonholm.
-
NO-, HABUSY & Co., for PBXXOWP
& ~
No. 8.
MiUigat+Leslie, Q.0.-Kissen, Q.C.
Stdutc-Conet~N~
10010583.003.png
1066 8. C. (H.L.). HOUSEOF LORDS.
127
lo, 1966.
Donglaa Wsleh brought an action againet the Lord Advocate, Webb-
m repreeenting the Minister of Labour and National service,^^^
in which he concluded " (1) for declasator (a) that the body of~dvooate.
Christian people known as Jehovah's Witnesses forms and is aLord=-
religions denomination for the purposee of paragraph 2 of theof~en.
First Schedule to the National Service Act, 1948, and (6) that the Lzdd.
pursuer, by virtue of his appointments 8s pioneer publisher and Lord
company 88rvant * of the said body, is a regulrtr mhisbr of thatMecDermott.
~uly
religious denomination ; (2) for an order, in terms of section 21 t;zvf$,"kn.
(1) (a) of the Crown Proceedings Act, 1947, declaring that the hrd
pursuer not being a person subjeot to mgbtration for the purposes Bomervell of
of eection 8 (1) of the National Service Act, 1948, the MinisterHmow.
of Labour and National Service has no power to serve or cause
to be served upon the pumer a notice requiring him to submit
himself for medical examination . . . 3'
A proof before answer was allowed. The facts established
at the proof appear sufficiently from the opinions of the Judgee.
On 7th January 1955, after considering the proof, the Lord
Ordinary (Strachan) granted a declarator in terms of conclusion
1 (a) and aeaoilzied the defender from conclusions 1 (b) and 2.
LOBD STR~~AN'S
o~mo~.-Thepursuer in this action is one of
the body known as Jehovah's Witnesses and within that body he holds
appointmente as a " pioneer publisher " and as a " congregation
servant." The question in the case is whether in virtue of those
appointments, or of one or other of them, he is exempt from national
eervice. The persons who ere not liable to be called up for national
service are set forth in the First Schedule to the National Service
Act, 1948, paragraph 2 of which is in the following terms :-" (2) A
man in holy orders or a regular minister of any religious denomination.''
The pursuer's cclse is that in view of the appointments which I
have mentioned he is a regular minister of a religious denomination
and is therefore exempt from service. That claim is opposed by the
Crown.
On 12th February 1954 I allowed a proof before answer in the case
and I refer to my opinion of thst date. The proof has now been
held before me end I have to decide the case upon the evidence which
hae been led. A very great deal of evidence was adduced for the
pursuer, the shorthand notee extending to no less than 760 pa es.
In my opinion, the relevant evidence could have been stated wit % in
much shorter compaee, but as this is a very unusual case, and is indeed
a teat case from the point of view of Jehovah's Witnesses, and as
three of their headquarters staff came specially from America to give
evidence, I took the view that it was desirable to give them the fullest
opportunity of putting forward their case and I was not disposed to
curtail the evidence which they offered. I had in mind also that this
is really the first opportunity in this country for an enquiry into the
relevant fads in a civil process. A similar question has been raised
in earlier caw but it has always previously been initiated in (I summary
prosecution, with the consequent limitations upon a right of appeal.
Ae indicated in my previous opinion there are two main questions
for decision, namely, (1) whether the body known as Jehovah's
* The title " company servant " wee later altered to " congregation
mant."
the Court of &mion 21st July 1966.)
(b
10010583.004.png
CASES DECIDED IN THE ,1866 8. C. (H.L.).
-
Welsh v.
Lord
Advocete.
is. Wit,nesses is a religious denomination within the meaning of the
statute, and (2)whether the pursuer is a regular minister of a religious
denomination within the meaning of the statute.
Before dealing specifically with those questions it is necessary in
the fist place to consider the history of Jehovah's Witnesses and
the evidence as to the nature and size of their organisation at the
present time, and aa to their activities. My previous opinion con-
tained a narrative of their history, so far as it appeared from the
averments made in the pleadings. At the risk of some repetition,
however, I think it is proper that I should restate the position aa now
disclosed in the evidence.
The body known ee Jehovah's Witnesses had ita origin in a Bible
cless or Bible study group whioh began studying the scripturea +ut
the year 1870 in Pittsburgh, in the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania.
One of the group waa Charles Taze Russell, who conducted a haber-
daahev store in Pittsburgh. He became the leader of the group and
his studies appear to have been directed among other things to an
interpretation of the prophecies and teachings of the scriptures wit,h
a view to fixing the date of the second coming of Christ and the events
that would happen then and thereafter. It is apparent that he formed
distinctive viewe on these and other topics, and he seems to have
attracted a growing number of adherents in a very short time. In
1879 he started to publish the magazine which is now known as The
Watchtower and which was originally called Zion'~ Watchtower. He
and hb fellow students took the name of Zion's Watch Tower Tract
Society, and, to give continuity to the body which he had thus founded,
a charitable corporation was formed under that name in 1884 under
the laws of Pennsylvania. Of four forms of corporation known to
the law of Pennsylvania the form of charitable corporation was
adopted because it was best suited to the purposes in view. The
reasons for forming the corporation were explained in the copy of
the Watchtower published in October 1884, to which I refer. The
purposes of the incorporated body as set forth in its charter in its
original form were, inter alia, as follows :-" The dissemination of
Bible truths in various languages by means of the publication of
tracte, pamphlets, papers and other religious documents, and by
the use of all other lawful means whioh its board of directors, duly
constituted, shall deem expedient for the furtherance of the purpose
stated."
In 1896 the name of the corporation was changed to Watch Tower
Bible and Tract Society. That corporation has always been the
parent society of the body now known as Jehovah's Witneeses.
By 1909 the activities of the society had spread to several countries
and for convenience in administration the headquarters waa moved
from Pittsburgh to Brooklyn, New York. In the same year another
corporation was incorporated under the law of New York with the
name of People's Pulpit Association. That association was formed
as a separate corporation on legal advice, partly in order to obtain
exemption from taxes in New York, and it became the corporation
for holding property in America and for directing the work of the
society in America. The name of the New York corporation was
later changed to Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society Inc.
The organisation continued to develop and spread, and itrc adherentcr
throughout the world became known rte the International Bible
Studenta Association. That n7as the name officially sanctioned by
the headquarters of the society for the membere of the body aa a
whole. Charles Taze Ruaeell was recognised by the membem aa
-
Lord
8trachn
(Ordinary).
July 19, 196
10010583.005.png
L.). HOUSE OF LORDS.
different countries in order to hold property and for other similar z::h
19, 1968.
London under the name of International Bible Students Association. -
A copy of the memorandum and articles of aeeociation of that company Lord
is in process. That body waa not, and never has been, the governing Strachen
authority of Jehovah's Witnesses in this country.
(Ordinary).
At an international convention of members held in Columbia, Ohio,
in 1931 it waa resolved to change the name of the organisation to
" Jehovah's Witneeses " and the body has been known by that name
ever since.
Great stress is laid by Jehovah's Witneesea on what is referred to
as theocratio rule, that is, government by God. The organisation is
wid to be theocratic, that is, it is governed from the top downwards
and not from the bottom upwards. Prior to 1938, however, the
congregations throughout the world had the right to elect certain
elders by whom the affairs of the congregations were managed. That
form of democratic election was held to be inconsistent with the
theocratio principle. In fact some of the eldere had evidently shown
excessive independence and, to put an end to that position, the office
of elder was abolished in 1938. An account of that change can be
found in the Watchtower of 1st Deoember 1951 in an article headed
" Theocratic Organisation Re-established."
In 1944 there waa a very material amendment of the charter of
the parent society. Claw I1 of the charter, which sets forth the
purpose8 of the society, waa thereby amended so as to read, inter dio,
as follows :-" 11. The purposes of thie Society are : To act as the
servant of and the legal worldwide governing agency for that body
of Christian pereons known aa Jehovah's Witnesses ; to preach the
gospel of God's kingdom under Christ Jesus unto all nations, aa e
witnees to the name, word and supremllcy of Almighty God JEHOVAH :
to print and distribute Bibles and to dieseminate Bible truths in
various languages by means of making and publishing literature
containing information and comment explaining Bible truth and
prophecy concerning establishment of Jehovah's kingdom under
Christ Jesus ; to authorize and appoint agents, servants, employees,
teachers, instructors, evangelists, missionaries and ministers to go
forth to all the world publicly and from house to house to preach
and teaah Bible truth to persons willing to listen by leaving with
such persona aid literature and by conducting Bible studies
thereon . . ."
In view of the material amendments of 1938 and 1944 I do not
propose to deal in any further detail with the orghtionof Jehovah's
Witnesses prior to those years. I have mentioned the amendments
becauae I think they are of considerable importance in relation to the
previous casee in this country in which the liability for military service
of a member of Jehovah's Witndhas been considered. In view
of the amendments these wea are largely superseded. The preaent
caee must be dispoeed of on the evidence as to the organhtion of the
present day.
The memberehip of Jehovah's Witnesses is now spread over about
160 countries. The year book for 1964 shows that the peek number
of members in 1953 waa 519,982. For the purposes of organisetion
and administration the world ie divided into 72 branches. Each
branch is divided into districts, which in turn are sub-divided into
circuib, and circuits into congregations. The British branch
i
1956 8. C. (H.
their pastor and he beoame known as Pastor Russell. With the spread ~uly
of the organisetion it was found convenient to form corporations in -
v.
pnrposee. In 1914, for such purposes, a company waa registered in *dvwete.
10010583.001.png
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin